Table 2.
Effect of Met deficiency on weight and relative weight of the bursa of Fabricius.
Item | Groups | 7 days | 14 days | 21 days | 28 days | 35 days | 42 days |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weight of bursae (g) | Control group | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.58 ± 0.05 | 1.41 ± 0.16 | 1.88 ± 0.14 | 2.84 ± 0.42 | 3.90 ± 0.46 |
Met deficiency | 019 ± 0.02 | 0.53 ± 0.05 | 1.05 ± 0.11 * | 1.12 ± 0.24 ** | 1.29 ± 0.28 ** | 2.17 ± 0.43 ** | |
Relative weight of bursae (g/kg) | Control group | 1.57 ± 0.01 | 1.69 ± 0.01 | 2.08 ± 0.01 | 1.79 ± 0.01 | 1.87 ± 0.01 | 1.93 ± 0.01 |
Met deficiency | 1.50 ± 0.02 | 1.56 ± 0.01 | 1.69 ± 0.01 ** | 1.40 ± 0.01 ** | 1.53 ± 0.01 ** | 1.38 ± 0.01 ** |
Data are the means ± standard deviation (n = 5); * P < 0.05, compared with the control group, ** P < 0.01, compared with the control group; Data were analyzed by Independent-Samples T test using SPSS 11.0 software.