Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 13;5(3):877–886. doi: 10.3390/nu5030877

Table 2.

Effect of Met deficiency on weight and relative weight of the bursa of Fabricius.

Item Groups 7 days 14 days 21 days 28 days 35 days 42 days
Weight of bursae (g) Control group 0.19 ± 0.02 0.58 ± 0.05 1.41 ± 0.16 1.88 ± 0.14 2.84 ± 0.42 3.90 ± 0.46
Met deficiency 019 ± 0.02 0.53 ± 0.05 1.05 ± 0.11 * 1.12 ± 0.24 ** 1.29 ± 0.28 ** 2.17 ± 0.43 **
Relative weight of bursae (g/kg) Control group 1.57 ± 0.01 1.69 ± 0.01 2.08 ± 0.01 1.79 ± 0.01 1.87 ± 0.01 1.93 ± 0.01
Met deficiency 1.50 ± 0.02 1.56 ± 0.01 1.69 ± 0.01 ** 1.40 ± 0.01 ** 1.53 ± 0.01 ** 1.38 ± 0.01 **

Data are the means ± standard deviation (n = 5); * P < 0.05, compared with the control group, ** P < 0.01, compared with the control group; Data were analyzed by Independent-Samples T test using SPSS 11.0 software.