Skip to main content
. 2008 Aug 22;8(8):4948–4960. doi: 10.3390/s8084948

Table 3.

The results of validated ships detection for the study area C. (BW: Background Window; GW: Guard Window; SW: Signal Window).

No. Ship name The proposed algorithm (BW: 25×25, GW:9×9) Two-parameter CFAR (BW:25×25, GW:9×9, SW:5×5) The proposed algorithm (BW:41×41, GW:13×13) Two-parameter CFAR (BW:41×41, GW:13×13, SW:5×5)
Detection Distance (km) Detection Distance (km) Detection Distance (km) Detection Distance (km)
1 Gladiator Yes 0.356 No 9.351 Yes 0.356 Yes 0.356
2 Alliance Yes 0.255 Yes 0.255 Yes 0.255 Yes 0.255
3 Andronica No 3.211 No 3.211 No 3.211 No 3.211
4 Alaska Sea Yes 0.786 No 4.710 Yes 0.786 Yes 1.555
5 Pavlof Yes 1.740 Yes 1.740 Yes 1.740 Yes 1.740
6 Handler Yes 0.186 Yes 0.186 Yes 0.186 Yes 0.186
7 Sultan Yes 0.867 No 5.534 Yes 0.867 No 5.563
8 Argosy Yes 0.914 Yes 0.914 Yes 0.914 Yes 0.914
9 Kelveen K Yes 2.201 Yes 2.201 Yes 2.201 Yes 2.201
10 Northwind Yes 0.261 Yes 0.261 Yes 0.261 Yes 0.261
11 Early Dawn Yes 0.375 Yes 0.375 Yes 0.375 Yes 0.375
12 Aleutian Beauty Yes 0.237 Yes 0.237 Yes 0.237 Yes 0.237
13 Big Blue Yes 0.629 Yes 0.629 Yes 0.629 Yes 0.629