Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 15;23(4):448–463. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2012.733830

Table I.

Means and standard deviations (SD) for parenting subscales in three sub-samples

Discipline13 items, 1–5 scale Mean (SD) Skill Encouragement 4 items, 1–7 scale Mean (SD) Positive Involvement 32 items, 1–7 scale Mean (SD) Problem Solving 32 items, 1–7 scale Mean (SD) Monitoring 11 items, 1–7 scale Mean (SD))
Rater pair A. N = 17
A1 3.96 (.45) 4.93 (51) 4.80 (53) 4.16 (93) 5.32 (23)
A2 3.61 (.57) 5.01 (58) 4.82 (.57) 4.56 (.94) 5.04 (.39)
Mean 3.79 4.97 4.81 4.36 5.18
Rater pair B. N = 5 (N = 4)
B1 4.34 (35) 4.48 (1.16) 5.31 (43) 4.86 (71) 5.48 (21)
B2 3.58 (53) 4.58 (1.33) 5.38 (.49) 4.98 (.72) 4.90 (.29)
Mean 3.96 4.53 5.35 4.92 5.19
Rater pair C N = 8
C1 4.48 (36) 4.89 (93) 5.45 (31) 5.04 (95) 5.27 (25)
C2 4.23 (32) 5.20 (.52) 5.36 (.35) 5.07 (.72) 5.48 (:J7;
Mean 4.36 5.05 5.41 5.06 5.38
Weighted mean 3.97 4.92 5.06 4.64 5.24

Note. Higher scores indicate better parenting practices. Rater pair A observed 17 families pre-treatment; rater pair B observed five families pre-treatment; and rater pair C observed eight families post-treatment. Likert-type items were rescaled to a 1–7 scale, except for the discipline items, which were rescaled to a 1–5 scale. One family was excluded from the analyses for rater pair B on the monitoring scale because of missing data.