Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2011 Apr;15(3):509–520. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9767-z

Table 2.

Analyses of variance predicting sexual risk behavior under the influence of substances

Outcome: percent of sexual acts
that were under the influence
Outcome: percent of high risk sexual
acts that were under the influence
df F η2 df F η2
Motivation–temptation conflict
  Full model (4, 134) 4.199** 0.114 (4, 134) 3.085* 0.087
  Age (1, 134) 0.01 0 (1, 134) 1.42 0.011
  Motivation–temptation conflict (1 = yes) (1, 134) 0.96 0.007 (1, 134) 0.36 0.003
  Expectancies (dichotomized, 1 = high) (1, 134) 15.74*** 0.108 (1, 134) 9.31** 0.067
  Interaction term (conflict × expectancies) (1, 134) 4.19* 0.031 (1, 134) 0.90 0.007
Motivation–pros conflict
  Full model (3, 134) 6.847*** 0.136 (3, 134) 5.006** 0.103
  Motivation–temptation conflict (1 = yes) (1, 134) 1.50 0.011 (1, 134) 1.286 0.01
  Expectancies (dichotomized; 1 = high) (1, 134) 19.19*** 0.128 (1, 134) 13.832*** 0.096
  Interaction term (conflict × expectancies) (1, 134) 6.64** 0.048 (1, 134) 3.982* 0.029
*

P< 0.05

**

P< 0.01

***

P< 0.001