Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Use. 2012;17(5-6):417–429. doi: 10.3109/14659891.2011.587092

Table IV.

Longitudinal mediation path analysis for past 30-day smoking frequency

Model path B SE 95% CI for B β Percent mediated R2
PSS model
 MAAS→PSS −0.147 0.016 (−0.115, −0.179) −0.178*
 PSS→Smoking 0.034 0.010 (0.014, 0.055) 0.048*
 MAAS→Smoking 0.002 0.011 (−0.019, 0.023) 0.003
 Indirect effect −0.005 0.002 (−0.002, −0.008) −0.009* 100
 Model R2 for PSS 0.221
 Model R2 for smoking 0.476
CESD model
 MAAS→CESD −0.129 0.013 (−0.104, −0.155) −0.165*
 CESD→Smoking 0.025 0.009 (0.007, 0.043) 0.033*
 MAAS→Smoking −0.002 0.010 (−0.022, 0.019) −0.003
 Indirect effect −0.003 0.003 (−0.011, 0.000) −0.005** 100
 Model R2 for CESD 0.187
 Model R2 for smoking 0.475
AQ model
 MAAS→AQ −0.079 0.019 (−0.041, −0.116) −0.082*
 AQ→Smoking 0.019 0.007 (0.005, 0.033) 0.031**
 MAAS→Smoking −0.004 0.010 (−0.024, 0.016) −0.007
 Indirect effect −0.001 0.001 (−0.007, 0.000) −0.003*** 100
 Model R2 for AQ 0.193
 Model R2 for smoking 0.475

Notes: MAAS, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale; CESD, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; PSS, Perceived Stress Scale; AQ, Aggression Questionnaire.

Percent mediated = indirect effect/total effect. Each model is adjusted for age, gender, parent education, school type, mediator score, treatment exposure and smoking frequency at baseline. Mediator assessed at 3 months post-baseline and outcome assessed at 13 months post-baseline. Hierarchical models are used to account for students nested within schools.

*

p < 0.01,

**

p < 0.05,

***

p < 0.10.