Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Aug 14;84(4):973–982. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.064

Table 3.

Unadjusted and adjusted analyses

Vaginal SLT
Skeletal SLT
Unadjusted
Adjusted
Unadjusted
Adjusted
Parameter HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Treatment .027 <.001 .023 .016
 CRT vs RT 1.5 (1.1–2.3) 3.0 (1.7–5.2) 5.83 (1.28–26.7) 7.0 (1.4–34.1)
Dilator compliance <.001 <.001 .709 NA
 High RG RG
 Moderate 3.0 (1.8–5.2) 3.6 (2.0–6.5) <.001
 Poor 5.0 (2.9–8.7) 8.5 (4.3–16.9) <.001
Age .001 .013 .049 .028
 >50 vs ≤50 2.0 (1.3–2.9) 1.8 (1.1–3.0) 3.7 (1.01–13.7) 5.7 (1.2–27.0)

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; NA = not applicable; RG = reference group.

Unadjusted analysis used Cox proportional hazards model. Adjusted analysis used Cox proportional hazards model built with stepwise selection procedure. Covariate factors included histology, body mass index, race, cigarette smoking history, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, history of intestinal disorder, history of abdominopelvic surgery, pre-radiotherapy nodal dissection, FIGO stage, pelvic EBRT biologically equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) (Gy3), paraortic nodal EBRT, brachytherapy dose rate, brachytherapy applicator type, pelvic EBRT/brachytherapy EQD2 (Gy3). Entry criterion was set at a P value <.20 on unadjusted log-rank analysis. All statistically significant P values on multivariate analysis were confirmed with Cox proportional hazards model with all covariates entered (data not shown).