Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 9;10(7):e1001469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001469

Table 2. Results on three exemplars applied to six evidence frameworks.

Exemplar Outcomes Tang et al. [12] GRADE [13] HASTE [14] USCPSTF [15] NHMRC [16] NHS Health Development Agency [17]
Household water chlorination Diarrhea Grade 2b level 1 possible ⊕⊕⊕ Moderate quality of evidence Grade 2b - Possible Strong “C” - Satisfactory “B”
Preventing mother-to-child transmission, all regimens included HIV infection in child within year of birth Grade 2b level 1 possiblea ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High quality of evidence Grade 1- Strong Strong “A” - Excellent “A”
Lay health workers in primary or community health care to reduce morbidity in children under age 5, compared to usual care Morbidity in children under 5 Grade 2b level 2 possibleb ⊕⊕ Low quality of evidence Grade 3 - Insufficient Strong “B” - Good “C”
a

Tang et al. grade for PMTCT is due to strict rule that only interventions with relative risk (RR)>2 qualify as “strong” evidence. If this rule is flexible we would rate PMTCT as “Grade 1 Level 1 Strong” by Tang et al. categorizations.

b

Grade 2c level 2 if repeatability outside Southeast Asia is not considered acceptable.