Skip to main content
. 2013 May 6;11:114. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-114

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analysis for clinicopathologic variables

 
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Parameters HRa 95% CIb Pc HRa 95% CIb Pc
Gender
 
 
 
 
 
 
Male vs. female
1.032
0.782-1.363
0.826
 
 
 
Age (years)
 
 
 
 
 
 
<52 vs.≥52
0.995
0.756-1.311
0.948
 
 
 
Histologic subtype
 
 
 
 
 
 
ad vs l
1.111
0.842-1.466
0.456
 
 
 
T classification
 
 
 
 
 
 
T1–T2 vs. T3–T4
0.956
0.832-1.099
0.529
 
 
 
C classification
 
 
 
 
 
 
I-II vs. III
0.961
0.818-1.129
0.629
 
 
 
Differention
 
 
 
 
 
 
Grade1,Grade2,Grade3
1.520
1.272-1.816
0.000
1.526
1.273-1.829
0.000
Membranous
 
 
 
 
 
 
positive and negative
0.763
0.571-1.021
0.069
0.820
0.609-1.106
0.193
Cytoplasmic
 
 
 
 
 
 
positive and negative
1.815
1.375-2.396
0.000
1.871
1.412-2.478
0.000
Nuclear
 
 
 
 
 
 
positive and negative
3.864
2.872-5.200
0.000
3.776
2.786-5.118
0.000
Nanog
 
 
 
 
 
 
positive and negative 1.994 1.494-2.661 0.000 1.700 1.249-2.315 0.001

a HR Harzard Rate.

b CI Confidence Interval.

c Cox regression model.

The expression levels of cytoplasmic and nuclear β-catenin and Nanog were an independent prognosticator for overall survive.