Skip to main content
. 2013 May 8;33(19):8541–8548. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5754-12.2013

Table 1.

iBIC and parameter means (SD) for each model (M1–M5) and novel extensions (M6a–M6c) that examined the influence of trial-to-trial EEG theta power

M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6a M6b M6c
iBIC 5613 5615 5379 5141 4926 4857 4947 4893
Feedback sensitivity (ρ) 4.05 (2.49) 4.67 (3.25) 4.95 (3.04)
Reward sensitivity (ρ_rew) 12.82 (22.27) 6.78 (4.67) 6.86 (4.35) 7.85 (6.40) 9.81 (8.84)
Punishment sensitivity (ρ_pun) 3.76 (2.83) 4.81 (3.76) 6.26 (5.67) 4.77 (3.62) 9.36 (10.23)
Learning rate (ε) 0.28 (0.18) 0.29 (0.19) 0.29 (0.19) 0.29 (0.17) 0.28 (0.15) 0.23 (0.15) 0.32 (0.13) 0.27 (0.17)
Irreducible noise (ξ) 0.97 (0.02) 0.94 (0.08) 0.97 (0.02) 0.97 (0.01) 0.96 (0.03) 0.99 (0.01) 0.96 (0.03)
Go bias (b) 0.38 (0.62) 0.13 (0.85) 0.50 (0.60) 0.58 (0.61) 0.49 (0.59) 0.58 (0.63)
Pavlovian bias (π) 0.48 (0.77) 0.77 (0.75) 0.34 (0.64)
Effect of theta (β) −0.67 (0.67) 0.48 (0.73) −0.32 (0.58)
Trade-off parameter (w) 0.31 (0.14)