Table III.
Study | Study design | Relevant inclusion/exclu-sion criteria | Treatment groups | Relevant demographics | Efficacy summary – primary end point(s) | Efficacy summary –selected secondary end points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anti-TNFs: | ||||||
Weinblatt et al. (2003); ARMADA39 | r, db, pc, 24 wk |
|
Pbo Q2wks + MTX n=62 ADA 20 mg Q2wks + MTX n=69 ADA 40 mg Q2wks + MTX n=67 ADA 80 mg Q2wks + MTX n=73 |
|
ACR20: 47.8%, 67.2%, and 65.8% of pts in the ADA 20mg, 40mg, and 80mg gps (P<0.001 for all vs pbo) |
ACR50: 31.9%, 55.2%, and 42.5% of pts in the ADA 20mg, 40mg, and 80mg gps (P=0.003, 20mg; P<0.001, 40mg and 80mg vs pbo) ACR70: 10.1%, 26.9%, and 19.2% of pts in the ADA 20mg, 40mg, and 80mg gps (P=NS, 20mg; P<0.001 40mg; P=0.02 80mg vs pbo) |
Keystone et al. (2004)44 | r, db, pc, 52 wk (24-wk data shown) |
|
Pbo Q1wk + MTX n=200 ADA 20 mg Q1wk + MTX n=212 ADA 40mg Q2wks + pbo alternate wks + MTX n=207 |
|
ACR20 at 24 weeks: ADA 20 mg, 60.8%; ADA 40 mg, 63.3% (P≤0.001 for both vs pbo) |
ACR50 at 24 weeks: ADA 20 mg, 41.0%; ADA 40 mg, 39.1% (P≤0.001 for both vs pbo) ACR70 at 24 weeks: ADA 20 mg, 17.5%; ADA 40 mg, 20.8% (P≤0.001 for both vs pbo) |
Van de Putte et al. (2004)45 | r, db, pc, 26 wk |
|
Pbo Q1wk n=110 ADA 20 mg Q2wks + pbo on alternate weeks n=106 ADA 20 mg Q1wk n=112 ADA 40 mg Q2wks + pbo on alternate weeks n=113 ADA 40 mg Q1wk n=103 |
|
ACR20: 35.8%, 39.3%, 46.0%, and 53.4% for ADA 20 mg Q2wks, ADA 20 mg Q1wk, ADA 40 mg Q2wks, and ADA 40 mg Q1wk (P≤ 0.01 vs pbo) |
ACR50: 18.9%, 20.5%, 22.1%, and 35.0% for ADA 20 mg Q2wks, ADA 20 mg Q1wk, ADA 40 mg Q2wks, and ADA 40 mg Q1wk (P≤ 0.05 vs pbo) ACR70: 8.5%, 9.8%, 12.4%, and 18.4% for ADA 20 mg Q2wks, ADA 20 mg Q1wk, ADA 40 mg Q2wks, and ADA 40 mg Q1wk (P≤ 0.05 vs pbo) |
Breedveld et al. (2006); PREMIER47 | r, db, 2 yr (1-yrs data shown) |
|
Pbo Q2wks + MTX (MTX gp) n=257 ADA 40 mg Q2wks + MTX (combo gp) n=268 ADA 40 mg Q2wks + pbo (ADA gp) n=274 |
|
ACR50 at 1 yr: 62% (combo gp) vs 41% (ADA gp) vs 46% (MTX gp) [P<0.001 for combo vs both] Mean change in mTSS at 1 yr: +1.3 (combo gp) vs +3.0 (ADA gp) vs +5.7 (MTX gp) [P≤0.002 for combo vs both] |
ACR20: 73% (combo gp) vs 54% (ADA gp) vs 63% (MTX gp) [P≤0.022 for both vs combo; P=0.043 MTX vs ADA] ACR70: 46% (combo gp) vs 26% (ADA gp) vs 28% (MTX gp) [P<0.001 for both vs combo] DAS28 remission: 43% (combo gp) vs 23% (ADA gp) vs 21% (MTX gp) [P<0.001 for both vs combo] |
Maini et al. (1999); ATTRACT42 | r, db, pc, 30 wk |
|
Pbo + MTX n=88 IFX 3mg/kg Q8wk + MTX n=86 IFX 3mg/kg Q4wk + MTX n=86 IFX 10mg/kg Q8wk + MTX n=87 IFX 10mg/kg Q4wk + MTX n=81 |
|
ACR20: 50–60% of IFX+MTX-treated pts (P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX) |
ACR50: 26–31% of IFX+MTX-treated pts (P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX) ACR70: 8–18% of IFX+MTX-treated pts (P≤0.007 vs pbo+MTX) |
St Clair et al. (2004)48 | r, db, pc, 54 wk |
|
MTX Q1wk + pbo at wks 0, 2, 6 and Q8wks thereafter n=282 MTX Q1wk + IFX 3mg/kg at wks 0, 2, 6 and Q8wks thereafter n=359 MTX Q1wk + IFX 6mg/kg at wks 0, 2, 6 and Q8wks thereafter n=363 |
|
ACR-N improvement: 38.9% (IFX 3 mg/kg + MTX gp), and 46.7% (IFX 6 mg/kg + MTX gp) [both P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX] |
ACR20: 62.4% (IFX 3mg/kg + MTX; P=0.024 vs pbo), and 66.2% (IFX 6mg/kg + MTX; P=0.001 vs pbo) ACR50: 45.6% (IFX 3mg/kg + MTX), and 50.4% (IFX 6mg/kg + MTX) [both P<0.001 vs pbo] |
Schiff et al. (2006); ATTEST61 | r, db, pc, 1 yr (6-mo data shown) |
|
Pbo+MTX n=110 IFX 3 mg/kg on days 1, 15, 43, 85 and Q8wks thereafter + MTX n=165 ABA ~10 mg/kg on days 1, 15, 29 and Q4wks thereafter + MTX n=156 |
|
Reduction in DAS28 at 6 mos: −2.53 (ABA+ MTX), and −2.25 (IFX+MTX) [both P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX] |
ACR20 at 6 mos: 66.7% (ABA+MTX; P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX), and 59.4% (IFX+MTX; P=0.006 vs pbo+MTX) ACR50 at 6 mos: 40.4% (ABA+MTX; P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX), and 37.0% (IFX+MTX; P=0.004 vs pbo+MTX) ACR70 at 6 mos: 20.5% (ABA+MTX; P=0.019 vs pbo+MTX), and 24.2% (IFX+MTX; P=0.002 vs pbo+MTX) |
Moreland et al. (1999)38 | r, db, pc, 6 mos |
|
Pbo bw n=80 ETN 10 mg bw n=76 ETN 25 mg bw n=78 |
|
ACR20: 51% (ETN 10 mg), and 59% (ETN 25 mg) [both P<0.001 vs pbo] ACR50: 24% (ETN 10 mg), and 40% (ETN 25 mg) [both P<0.001 vs pbo] |
ACR70: 9% (ETN 10 mg), and 15% (ETN 25 mg) [P=0.031 for 10 mg vs pbo; P=0.001 for 25 mg vs pbo] |
Bathon et al. (2000)50 | r, pc, 12 mos |
|
MTX 7.5–20 mg Q1wk n=217 ETN 10 mg bw n=208 ETN 25 mg bw n=207 |
|
AUC for ACR-N: Significantly greater in the ETN 25 mg gp vs MTX at 3, 6, 9, and 12 mos (P<0.05) | ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70: Significantly higher % pts treated with ETN 25 mg vs MTX achieved responses in the first 4–6 mos (P<0.05), with NS difference thereafter. At 12 mos, ACR20 was 72% vs 65% (NS) |
Klareskog et al. (2004); TEMPO43 | r, db, 52 wk |
|
MTX Q1wk n=228 ETN 25 mg bw n=223 ETN+MTX (combo) n=231 |
|
Mean difference in ACR-N AUC at 24 wks: 6.1 for combo vs MTX (P<0.0001); 2.5 for ETN vs MTX (P=0.0034) |
ACR20: 85% for combo vs 75% for MTX (P=0.0091) and vs 76% for ETN (P=0.0151) ACR50: 69% for combo vs 43% for MTX (P<0.0001), and vs 48% for ETN (P<0.0001) ACR70: 43% for combo vs 19% for MTX (P<0.0001), and vs 24% for ETN (P<0.0001) DAS28 remission: 35% for combo vs 13% for MTX (P<0.0001), and 16% for ETN (P<0.0001) |
Weinblatt et al. (2007)51 | r, db, pc, 1 yr |
|
ETN 25 mg bw + pbo n=36 ETN 25 mg bw + ABA 2 mg/kg on days 1, 15, 30, and Q4wk thereafter n=85 |
|
ACR20 at 6 mos: 48.2% (ETN+ABA gp) vs 30.6% (ETN+pbo gp) [NS] |
ACR20 at 1 yr: 48.2% (ETN+ABA gp) vs 30.6% (ETN+pbo gp) [NS] ACR50 at 1 yr: 28.2% (ETN+ABA gp) vs 16.7% (ETN+pbo gp) [NS] ACR70 at 1 yr: 9.4% (ETN+ABA gp) vs 5.6% (ETN+pbo gp) [NS] |
Emery et al. (2008); COMET49 | r, db, 52 wks |
|
Pbo + MTX Q1wk n=263 ETN 50 mg + MTX Q1wk n=265 |
|
DAS28 remission: 50% of pts in ETN+MTX gp vs 28% in MTX gp (P<0.0001) No radiographic progression (change in mTSS ≤0.5): 80% of pts in ETN+MTX gp vs 59% in MTX gp (P<0.0001) |
ACR20/50/70: 86%/71%/48% for ETN+MTX vs 67%/49%/28% for Pbo+MTX (P<0.0001) |
Fleischmann et al. (2008); FAST4WARD57 | r, db, pc, 24 wks |
|
Pbo Q4wks n=109 CTZ 400 mg Q4wks n=111 |
|
ACR20: 45.5% for CTZ gp (P<0.001 vs pbo) |
ACR50: 22.7% for CTZ gp (P<0.001 vs pbo) ACR70: 5.5% for CTZ gp (P<0.05 vs pbo) |
Keystone et al. (2008); RAPID-155 | r, db, pc, 52 wks (24-wk data shown) |
|
Pbo Q2wks + MTX n=199 CTZ 200 mg Q2wks + MTX n=393 CTZ 400 mg Q2wks + MTX n=390 |
|
ACR20 at wk 24: 58.8% for the CTZ 200mg + MTX gp, and 60.8% for the CTZ 400mg + MTX gp (both P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX) Mean change in mTSS at wk 52: +0.4 for the CTZ 200 mg + MTX gp, and +0.2 for the CTZ 400 mg + MTX gp (both P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX) |
ACR50 at wk 24: 37.1% for the CTZ 200 mg + MTX gp, and 39.9% for the CTZ 400mg + MTX gp (both P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX) ACR70 at wk 24: 21.4% for the CTZ 200 mg + MTX gp, and 20.6% for the CTZ 400 mg + MTX gp (both P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX) |
Smolen et al. (2009); RAPID-256 | r, db, pc, 24 wks |
|
Pbo Q2wks + MTX n=127 CTZ 200 mg Q2wks + MTX n=246 CTZ 400 mg Q2wks + MTX n=246 |
|
ACR20: 57.3% in the CTZ 200 mg + MTX gp, and 57.6% in the CTZ 400 mg + MTX gp (both P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX) |
ACR50: 32.5% in the CTZ 200 mg + MTX gp, and 33.1% in the CTZ 400 mg + MTX gp (both P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX) ACR70: 15.9% in the CTZ 200 mg + MTX gp, and 10.6% in the CTZ 400 mg + MTX gp (both P≤0.01 vs pbo+MTX) |
Keystone et al. (2009); GO-FORWARD60 | r, db, pc, 52 wks |
|
Pbo Q4wks + MTX n=133 GOL 100 mg Q4wks + PBO n= 133 GOL 50 mg Q4wks + MTX n=89 GOL 100 mg Q4wks + MTX n=89 |
|
ACR20 at wk 14: 44.4%, 55.1%, and 56.2% for the GOL 100 mg + pbo, GOL 50 mg + MTX, and GOL 100 mg + MTX gps, respectively (NS, P=0.001, and P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX) HAQ-DI change from baseline to wk 24: –0.13, –0.38, and –0.50 for the GOL 100 mg + pbo, GOL 50 mg + MTX, and GOL 100 mg + MTX gps, respectively (NS, P<0.001, and P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX) |
ACR20 at wk 24: 35.3%, 59.6%, and 59.6% for the GOL 100 mg + pbo, GOL 50 mg + MTX, and GOL 100 mg + MTX gps, respectively (NS, P<0.001, and P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX) ACR50 at wk 24: 19.5%, 37.1%, and 32.6% for the GOL 100mg + pbo, GOL 50 mg + MTX, and GOL 100 mg + MTX gps, respectively (NS, P<0.001, and P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX) ACR70 at wk 24: 11.3%, 20.2%, and 14.6% for the GOL 100 mg + pbo, GOL 50 mg + MTX, and GOL 100 mg + MTX gps, respectively (NS, P<0.001, and P=0.017 vs pbo+MTX) DAS28 remission at wk 24: 12.0%, 20.2%, and 22.5% for the GOL 100 mg + pbo, GOL 50 mg + MTX, and GOL 100 mg + MTX gps, respectively (NS, P=0.001, and P<0.001 vs pbo+MTX) |
Smolen et al. (2009); GO-AFTER59 | r, db, 24 wk |
|
GOL 50 mg Q4wks GOL 100 mg Q4wks Pbo Q4wks |
|
ACR20 at wk 14: 35% and 38% for the GOL 50 mg, and GOL 100 mg gps (P=0.0006, and P=0.0001 vs pbo) |
ACR20 at wk 24: 34% and 44% for the GOL 50 mg and GOL 100 mg gps (P=0.0005, and P<0.0001 vs pbo) ACR50 at wk 24: 18% and 20% for the GOL 50 mg and GOL 100 mg gps (P=0.0003, and P=0.0001 vs pbo) ACR 70 at wk 24: 12% and 10% for the GOL 50 mg and GOL 100 mg gps (P=0.0041, and P=0.0107 vs pbo) |
IL-1 receptor inhibitor: | ||||||
Bresnihan et al. (1998)54 | r, db, pc, 24 wks |
|
Pbo n=121 ANA 30 mg od n=119 ANA 75 mg od n=116 ANA 150 mg od n=116 |
|
ACR composite criteria (% pts improved): 39%, 34%, and 43% for the ANA 30 mg, 75 mg, and 150 mg gps, respectively (P=0.054, P= 0.258, P=0.014 vs pbo) | ACR20/50/70 responses not reported |
Cohen et al. (2002)53 | r, db, pc, 24 wks |
|
Pbo+MTX n=74 ANA 2 mg/kg (only highest dose of dose-ranging study shown) + MTX n=72 |
|
ACR20 at wk 12: 38% with ANA 2mg/kg (P=0.007 vs pbo) |
ACR20 at wk 24: 35% with ANA 2mg/kg (P=0.143 vs pbo) ACR50 at wk 24: 17% with ANA 2mg/kg (P not shown) ACR70 at wk 24: 7% with ANA 2mg/kg (P not shown) |
T-cell co-stimulation inhibitor: | ||||||
Genovese et al. (2005)37 | r, db, pc, 6 mo |
|
Pbo on days 1, 15, 29, and Q4wks thereafter n=133 ABA ~10mg/kg on days 1, 15, 29, and Q4wks thereafter n=258 |
|
ACR20: 50.4% in ABA gp vs 19.5% in pbo gp (P<0.001) HAQ-DI improvement ≥0.3: 47.3% in ABA gp vs 23.3% in pbo gp (P<0.001) |
ACR50: 20.3% in ABA gp vs 3.8% in pbo gp (P<0.001) ACR70: 10.2% in ABA gp vs 1.5% in pbo gp (P=0.003) DAS28 remission: 10.0% in ABA gp vs 0.8% in pbo gp (P<0.001) |
B-cell CD20 antigen: | ||||||
Cohen et al. (2006); REFLEX36 | r, db, pc, 24 wks |
|
Pbo wk 1 and 15 + MTX Q1wk n=209 RTX wk 1 and 15 + MTX Q1wk n=308 |
|
ACR20: 51% (RTX+MTX) vs 18% (pbo+MTX) [P<0.0001] |
ACR50: 27% (RTX+MTX; P<0.0001 vs pbo+MTX) ACR70: 12% (RTX+MTX; P<0.0001 vs pbo+MTX) SF-36: Mean increase from baseline in mental and physical summary scores 4.7 and 5.8 for RTX+MTX (P=0.0002 vs pbo+MTX) Joint space narrowing (JSN) score: change +0.2 (RTX+MTX; P=0.016 vs pbo+MTX) |
ABA = abatacept; ADA = adalimumab; ANA = anakinra; anti-TNF = tumor necrosis factor inhibitor; AUC = area under the curve; bw = twice weekly; CTX = certolizumab pegol; db = double-blind; DMARD = disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; ETN = etanercept; GOL = golimumab; gp = group; HAQ-DI = Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; IFX = infliximab; IR = inadequate response; mTSS = modified total Sharp score; MTX = methotrexate; mo = month; NS = not significant; od = once daily; pbo = placebo; pc = placebo-controlled; pts = patients; Q1wk = every week; Q2wks = every 2 weeks, etc.; r = randomized; RTX = rituximab; SF-36 = Short Form-36; TNFi = tumor necrosis factor inhibitor; wk = week; yrs = years.