Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 10.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Jul 1;30(7):693–700. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2280

Table 1. PacBio correction results.

Corrected (PBcR) read accuracy as compared to reference sequence. Reads were mapped using Nucmer 3.23.50 For all statistics, only reads > 500 bp were included. %TP (Throughput): the percentage of raw uncorrected bases that are in non-chimeric, correctly trimmed sequences after correction. %Idy (Identity): average identity of good corrected reads to the reference. %Cov (Coverage): average coverage of good corrected reads by a single match to the reference. %Chimer: the percentage of corrected bases within reads with a split mapping to the reference. %Trim: the percentage of corrected bases within reads with a single match to the reference over less than 99.5% of their length. The corrected sequences remain above 99% identity and 99% trim within the repetitive regions of the genome (Supplementary Table S3).

Organism % TP % Idy (Reads) % Idy (Assembly) % Cov % Chimer % Trim Time (s) Mem (GB)
Lambda NEB3011 74.03% 99.90% 100.00% 100.00% 1.82% 0.10% 121 0.12
E. coli K12 57.46% 99.99% 99.99 % 99.92% 2.02% 0.34% 1580 2.10
S. cerevisiae S228c 21.86% 99.90% 99.97% 99.93% 1.46% 0.33% 4357 5.90