Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 12.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2012 Aug 14;111(9):1176–1189. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.266395

Table 1.

Parameters measured from plasma of low fat-fed and high fat-fed WT and eNOS-TG mice.

Parameter WT LFD WT HFD eNOS-TG LFD eNOS-TG HFD
* Insulin (pg/ml) 116.2±40.7 3010.6±537.3 480.8±95.4|| 568.1±175.6#
Adiponectin (μg/ml) 22.0±3.8 25.7±4.0 27.8±3.0 30.1±3.8
Resistin (pg/ml) 2449.8±156.1 7894.0±1155.0 3547.3±387.2|| 6251.3±497.9§,@
Leptin (pg/ml) 209.0±38.3 5099.0±1265.0 997.4±203.4|| 4874.4±783.1§,@
Cholesterol (mg/dl) 96.4±2.7 117.8±5.9 92.1±4.4|| 124.0±6.8§,@
Triglycerides (mg/dl) 37.8±2.5 46.2±4.8 26.2±3.0|| 23.8±2.8§,#
NEFA (mEq/L) 0.39±0.05 0.38±0.06 0.19±0.04,|| 0.16±0.02§,#
* Glycerol (mg/L) 11.2±1.2 14.7±1.9 12.0±1.4 12.7±0.5

Wild-type (WT) and eNOS-TG mice were fed a low fat diet (LFD) or high fat diet (HFD) for 6 weeks. Plasma from the mice was used to measure the indicated parameters.

*

n = 6–7 mice per group; for all other parameters, the groups contained 13–14 mice per group.

WT LFD vs. WT HFD

WT LFD vs. eNOS-TG LFD

§

WT LFD vs. eNOS-TG HFD

||

WT HFD vs. eNOS-TG LFD

#

WT HFD vs. eNOS TG HFD

@

eNOS-TG LFD vs. eNOS-TG HFD