Table I. Effect of H2O2 treatment on TCP protein-dependent CUC1 expression.
Constructa | H2O2 Treatment | Total | CUC1 Patternb | Extended Patternc | P (Treated versus Untreated)d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | n | n | |||
HAHB4 | No | 35 | 35 | 0 | 1.000 |
Yes | 31 | 31 | 0 | ||
TCP15-EAR | No | 39 | 4 | 35 | <0.0001 |
Yes | 40 | 29 | 11 | ||
TCP20-EAR | No | 36 | 5 | 31 | <0.0001 |
Yes | 39 | 37 | 2 | ||
C20S-TCP15-EAR | No | 31 | 2 | 29 | 1.000 |
Yes | 38 | 2 | 36 |
Construct used for transformation. Expression was under the control of the 35S CaMV promoter. bExpression in the meristematic region. No or very low expression was seen in cotyledons. cExpression in cotyledon lamina (more than 50% of surface). dChange in expression pattern after H2O2 treatment. Two-tailed P values were calculated using Fisher’s exact test.