Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug;154(8):1333–1342. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.04.011

Table 1.

Summary of intrinsic membrane properties in spinal lamina I neuronsa.

Characteristic Control (n = 9) CS (LTP + no LTP) (n = 16) LTP (n = 10) No LTP (n = 6)
RMP, mV
Pre −55 ± 1 −55 ± 3 −57 ± 4 −52 ± 2
Post −58 ± 4 −52 ± 1 −51 ± 2 −54 ± 1



Action potential threshold, mV
Pre −34 ± 2 −37 ± 2 −40 ± 3 −33 ± 3
Post −33 ± 2 −37 ± 2 −39 ± 3 −33 ± 4



RMPaction potential threshold, ΔV, mV
Pre 21 ± 2 18 ± 4 17 ± 6 19 ± 2
Post 25 ± 5 15 ± 3 12 ± 3 21 ± 4



Action potential height, mV
Pre 87 ± 5 89 ± 3 89 ± 4 88 ± 5
Post 77 ± 5 85 ± 3 87 ± 3 83 ± 6



Action potential width at base, ms
Pre 1.5 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.1 1.5 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.1
Post 1.5 ± 0.2 1.4 ± 0.1 1.4 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.1



Posthyperpolarization amplitude, mV
Pre −30 ± 3 −30 ± 3 −27 ± 3 −35 ± 4
Post −33 ± 3 −30 ± 3 −26 ± 3 −37 ± 5



Membrane resistance, MΩ
Pre 712 ± 89 601 ± 131 592 ± 151 616 ± 240
Post 380 ± 83 346 ± 77 408 ± 119 243 ± 37

CS, conditioning depolarizing stimulation; LTP, long-term potentiation; RMP, resting membrane potential.

a

Data are presented as mean ± 1 standard error of the mean. No statistically significant difference was observed in any of the stimulated groups compared to the control group, nor between any of the depolarized groups, respectively.

P < 0.05 compared to baseline values (Pre).