Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 11.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;63(12):1337–1344. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.12.1337

Table 2.

Survival Analysis Results From Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model*

Model Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P Value
Model 1
  Treatment 1.13 (0.69–1.36) .62
Model 2
  Treatment 1.18 (0.71–1.94) .53
  Psychosis 0.56 (0.32–1.00) .05
  Age§ 0.99 (0.97–1.00) .13
  Sex 0.63 (0.37–1.08) .09

Abbreviations: C-ECT, continuation electroconvulsive therapy; C-Pharm, combination of lithium carbonate plus nortriptyline hydrochloride; CI, confidence interval.

*

Results are presented for 2 Cox proportional hazards regression models. Model 1 contained treatment, and model 2 (adjusted model) contained treatment, psychosis, age, and sex. Model 2 also contained clinical center as a covariate.

Reference category was C-Pharm; hazard ratio of relapse for C-ECT compared with C-Pharm. The C-ECT group was 1.2 times more likely to relapse than C-Pharm group.

Reference category was no psychosis; hazard ratio of relapse for psychosis compared with no-psychosis group. A patient with psychotic features is 0.56 times less likely to relapse than a patient without psychotic features, after adjustment for treatment, age, sex, and center.

§

Age was entered as a continuous variable; hazard ratio represents the change in the hazard of relapse for every 1-year increment (decrement) in age. As age increases by 1 year, the estimated hazard ratio is decreased (since the parameter estimate is negative) 0.99 times.

Reference category was male; hazard ratio of relapse for female compared with male group. A female patient is 0.63 times less likely to relapse than a male patient after adjustment for treatment, age, psychosis, and clinical center.