Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 21;15(4):361–371. doi: 10.1007/s11307-013-0623-1
BS 3. Translational Aspects
Key Questions
• Is pre-clinical PET/MRI beneficial for small animal research?
• What are the advantages of pre-clinical studies compared to clinical studies?
• Which PET/MRI system design is most useful for pre-clinical imaging today?
Status Quo
◼ PET/MRI offers many advantages such as reduced radiation dose, functional parameters and improved tissue characterization compared to pre-clinical PET/CT.
◼ First pre-clinical PET/MRI systems are already in use.
◼ Fast physiology in animals as well as higher throughput favour simultaneous PET/MRI.
Conclusions and Open Questions
➢ Studies are needed to show the quantitative accuracy and reproducibility of small animal PET/MRI.
➢ Complex research questions can be studied more easily using the controlled conditions of pre-clinical research.
➢ Sequential approaches are suitable to combine anatomy with function; however, multifunctional research questions are more likely to be answered using isochronous PET/MRI.
➢ Translation mandates interdisciplinary training for users.
➢ Funding and cost–benefit models will impact the progress of pre-clinical PET/MRI.