Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 25;2013:286328. doi: 10.1155/2013/286328

Table 1.

The productivity of and quality of cuttings from non-grafted and grafted chrysanthemum “Jinba”.

Batch
Treatment Yield (no. of cuttings per 10 plants) Mean length (cm) Mean node number Mean diameter (mm) Mean fresh matter (g) Mean dry matter (g)
H1 Non-grafted 37 8.1 ± 0.40a 5.2 ± 0.19b 3.43 ± 0.091a 1.98 ± 0.137a 0.244 ± 0.022a
Grafted 42 8.1 ± 0.36a 6.3 ± 0.29a 3.14 ± 0.054b 1.98 ± 0.127a 0.236 ± 0.012a
H3 Non-grafted 98 5.1 ± 0.26b 5.9 ± 0.23a 2.95 ± 0.043b 0.99 ± 0.040b 0.163 ± 0.019b
Grafted 150 6.1 ± 0.22a 6.3 ± 0.19a 3.35 ± 0.029a 1.48 ± 0.072a 0.203 ± 0.028a
H5 Non-grafted 72 6.9 ± 0.28b 7.3 ± 0.21b 2.50 ± 0.054b 1.09 ± 0.061b 0.191 ± 0.012b
Grafted 83 8.6 ± 0.49a 9.1 ± 0.35a 2.72 ± 0.058a 1.42 ± 0.088a 0.246 ± 0.016a

Significant differences of different treatments are compared in the same batch. H1: cuttings harvested on June 17; H3: cuttings harvested on July 27; H5: cuttings harvested on September 5; values (mean ± S.E.) labelled with a different letter suffix differ significantly from one another at the same time point according to Duncan's multiple range test (P < 0.05).