Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 27;109(1):68–75. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.303

Table 3. Hazard ratios for cancer death in the Cox model adjusted in the prognosis groups in ns-TGCTs treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

  Hazard ratio 95% Confidence interval P-value
Bivariate analysis
ERCC1 IHC and CPS/non-CPSa
Positive and non-CPS 17.06 (6.24-46-62) <0.001
Negative and non-CPS 20.75 (8.06–53.42) <0.001
Negative and CPS
1
 
 
IGCCCG classification
Good prognosis 0.06 (0.01–0.26) <0.001
Intermediate prognosis 0.63 (0.31–1.26) 0.19
Poor prognosis
1
 
 
Multivariate analysis
ERCC1 IHC and CPS/non-CPSa
Positive and non-CPS 11.86 (3.88–36.21) <0.001
Negative and non-CPS 14.43 (4.98–41.81) <0.001
Negative and CPS
1
 
 
IGCCCG classification
Good prognosis 0.38 (0.07–2.05) 0.26
Intermediate prognosis 0.92 (0.45–1.91) 0.84
Poor prognosis 1    

Abbreviations: CPS=cisplatin sensitive; ERCC1= excision repair cross-complementation group 1; IGCCCG classification=International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborating Group classification; IHC=immunohistochemistry; non-CPS=non-cisplatin sensitive; ns-TGCTs=non-seminomatous testicular germ cell tumours.

a

The hazard ratio and confident interval values could not be estimated for the ERCC1-positive and CPS patients group because the deaths were not presented.