Table 2.
Distribution of study sample by state, park, and whether they were recruited from homes or within the park
| State | Analysis sample | Park 1 | Park 2 | Park 3 | Park 4 | Park 5 | Park 6 | Park 7* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||||||
| N | n | n | n | n | n | n | n | ||
| CA | Overall | 49 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 8 |
| Household interview | 12 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| Park user | 37 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | |
| NC | Overall | 49 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
| Household interview | 9 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Park user | 40 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | ||
| NM | Overall | 47 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | |
| Household interview | 11 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Park user | 34 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | ||
| missing | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| OH | Overall | 48 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 6 | |
| Household interview | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Park user | 48 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 6 | ||
| PA | Overall | 39 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 4 | |
| Household interview | 14 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Park user | 25 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 2 | ||
*
Only CA included 7 parks; all other sites studied 6 parks.