Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Behav. 2012 Apr 10;45(4):526–547. doi: 10.1177/0013916512436421

Table 5.

Evidence for validity comparing the survey to the GPS

Q1. Usual frequency of park visits* Q2. Usual duration of park visits** Q4. Past week number of visits to the park Q5. Past week length of park visit **
n SCC (95% CI) n SCC (95% CI) n SCC (95% CI) n SCC (95% CI)
Week 1 214 0.50 (0.39, 0.61) 214 0.52 (0.42, 0.63) 205 0.62 (0.51, 0.73) 209 0.64 (0.55, 0.74)
Week 2 220 0.45 (0.33, 0.56) 220 0.53 (0.42, 0.63) 213 0.63 (0.53, 0.74) 216 0.67 (0.58, 0.76)
Week 3 225 0.40 (0.28, 0.52) 225 0.50 (0.39, 0.61) 213 0.65 (0.54, 0.75) 221 0.62 (0.53, 0.72)

CI=confidence interval; SCC=Spearman correlation coefficients

*

The categories used to assess Q1 were: daily, a few times/week; once/week; a couple times/week; monthly; rarely/first time/never

**

The categories used to assess Q2 and Q5 were: 0; <15 min; 15–30 min; 31–60 min; >1 but <2 hours; 2–3 hours; >3 but <5 hours; >=5 hours

Question items correspond to the question numbers in Appendix 1.

Q1 and Q2 were compared to GPS findings averaged over the 3-week period.

Q4 and Q5 were compared to the GPS from the specific week under study.