Table 1. Sample collection and in-country laboratory analysis.
Thailand | Tanzania | Zimbabwe | Soweto South Africa | Vulindlela South Africa | Africa (4 sites) | |
Eligible participantsa | 8,041 | 9,974 | 12,666 | 14,682 | 12,139 | 49,461 |
Participants with blood samplesb | 7,619 | 9,041 | 11,880 | 13,929 | 11,843 | 46,693 |
HIV NEG | 7,502 | 8,312 | 10,313 | 11,922 | 8,148 | 38,695 |
HIV DISC | 39 | 187 | 19 | 22 | 46 | 274 |
HIV POS | 78 | 542 | 1,548 | 1,985 | 3,649 | 7,724 |
Initial estimate of HIV prevalencec | 1.02% | 5.99% | 13.0% | 14.3% | 30.8% | 16.5% |
Excludes participants who were not contacted, declined participation, or did not meet enrollment criteria.
Samples were not obtained for 2,744 eligible participants (2,310 no consent, 439 blood draw failure, 19 excluded for other reasons). The HIV status of study participants was initially characterized based on the results of the two HIV rapid tests performed in-country (see Methods): HIV POS: two reactive HIV rapid tests. HIV DISC: one reactive and one non-reactive HIV rapid test. HIV NEG: two non-reactive HIV rapid tests.
An initial estimate of HIV prevalence was based on in-country testing (calculated as # HIV POS samples/total # samples×100).