Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 11;8(7):e68349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068349

Table 2. Quality assurance testing.

Tanzania Zimbabwe Soweto South Africa Vulindlela South Africa Total
Quality assurance testing of HIV NEG samples a
Tested with HIV Combo (%)b 1,932 1,999 2,900 2,910 9,741
Combo reactive 15 (0.78%) 7 (0.35%) 65 (2.24%) 23 (0.79%) 110 (1.13%)
HIV POS and HIV DISC samples censored (among those originally classified as HIV POS or HIV DISC)
Excluded due to contamination 0 0 292 0 292
Excluded for other reasonsc 0 1 23 4 28
Classification of HIV DISC samples a
Samples remaining after exclusions 187 19 20 46 272
HIV uninfected 184 18 18 45 265
HIV infected 3 1 2 1 7
Acute infection 1 0 0 0 1
Early infection 0 0 0 0 0
Established infection 2d 1d 2e 1e 6
Classification of HIV POS samples a
Samples remaining after exclusions 542 1,547 1,672 3,645 7,406
HIV uninfected 9 17 22 4 52
HIV infected 533 1,530 1,650 3,641 7,354
Acute infection 0 0 0 3 3
Early infection 1 0 0 2 3
Established infection 532 1,530 1,650 3,636 7,348

Abbreviations: WB: Western blot; HIV Combo: ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo assay.

a

The HIV status of study participants was initially characterized based on the results of the two HIV rapid tests performed in-country (see Methods): HIV POS: two reactive HIV rapid tests. HIV DISC: one reactive and one non-reactive HIV rapid test. HIV NEG: two non-reactive HIV rapid tests. The testing algorithm used to confirm the HIV status of HIV NEG and HIV DISC samples (quality assurance testing) are shown in Figure 1. Quality assurance testing was only performed for HIV POS samples if results from the avidity assay suggested absent or extremely low levels of anti-HIV antibodies.

b

This indicates the number of samples that had reactive results using the HIV Combo assay (signal/cutoff >1). According to the package insert, specimens that are initially reactive with HIV Combo should be retested in duplicate and only repeatedly reactive specimens are considered reactive. In this study, samples were analyzed only once using the HIV Combo assay.

c

28 samples were excluded for reasons other than contamination, including: no CD4 cell count obtained (N = 5); insufficient quantity of plasma stored for testing (N = 2); failure of sample tracking (N = 17); protocol violation (N = 4).

d

These three samples were subsequently classified as MAA positive.

e

These three samples were subsequently classified as MAA negative.