Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 14;27(7):573–582. doi: 10.1007/s40263-013-0074-x

Table 2.

Summary of methodology used in the meta-analyses

Cochrane Winblad Doody PenTAG IQWiGa
Selection of studies
 Included studies MRZ-9605 MRZ-9605 MRZ-9605 MRZ-9605 MRZ-9605
MEM-MD-01 MEM-MD-01 MEM-MD-01 MEM-MD-01 MEM-MD-01
MEM-MD-02 MEM-MD-02 MEM-MD-02 MEM-MD-02 MEM-MD-02
Lu-99679 Lu-99679 Lu-99679 MEM-MD-12b Lu-99679
MEM-MD-10 MEM-MD-10 MEM-MD-10 MEM-MD-10
MEM-MD-12 MEM-MD-12 MEM-MD-12 MEM-MD-12
Lu-10116
 Use of posthoc analysis of subgroups No Yes No No Yes
Selection of patients
 Includes patients across the licensed population for memantine Yes Yes Yes No (exclusion of MMSE 14–19) Yes
 Inclusion of off-label patients Yes (MMSE >19) No Yes (MMSE >19) No No
Analysis strategy
 Monotherapy and combination studies Grouped Grouped Separated and grouped Separated Separated and grouped
 Moderately severe to severe AD and mild to moderate AD Separated Grouped Separated and grouped Separated—only moderately severe to severe Grouped
Analysis method
 Management scores (MD or SMD) MD SMD SMD MD MD and SMD if necessary
 Management of missing data (OC or LOCF) LOCF OC (plus LOCF supportive analysis) LOCF (plus OC supportive analysis) ITT, as reported in individual studies ITT, as reported in individual studies

AD Alzheimer’s disease, ITT intent to treat, LOCF last observation carried forward, MD mean difference, OC observed cases, SMD standardized mean differenc

aExcluded severe patients (identified as those having a baseline MMSE below 10) from study MEM-MD-02

bIncluded in original PenTAG analysis but excluded here to ensure consistency between monotherapy and combination analyses