Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 6;10(3):892–912. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10030892

Table 4.

Ego’s use of HIV prevention and testing. odds ratios, multilevel random effects models.

Ego’s Uses HIV Prevention Ego has Tested for HIV
Labor migration status
  Migrant’s wife 1.09 1.03
Worried of AIDS infection from spouse 1.34 1.47
Network member is married to migrant 0.76 † 0.93
Network member uses HIV prevention 4.92 **
Network member has tested for HIV 8.64 **
Network Resources
  Kin 0.77 1.17
  Older than ego 0.93 0.89
  Younger than ego 1.01 0.99
  Same religion as ego’s 1.27 0.92
  Network member would loan money 1.35 0.96
  Network member works 1.13 1.11
Ego’s characteristics
  Age (in years) 1.01 0.96 *
  Number of living children 0.96 1.17 *
  1–4 years of school 1.15 0.82
  5 or more years of school 1.33 1.43
  Currently working 1.64 * 0.72
  In polygynous union 0.75 1.11
  Resides with parents in-law 0.91 1.01
  Household’s material possession index 1.23 * 1.18
  Thatched roof 1.30 1.07
  Household owns cattle 0.68 † 1.04
  Mainline church 1.01 1.73
  Zionist/Pentecostal 1.09 * 1.97 *
  [No religion] 2.09 1.34
  Had talked to husband about AIDS 2.09 ** 1.34
Migrant’s wife*network member is married to migrant*network member prevent HIV 2.10
Migrant’s wife*network member is married to migrant*network member Tested for HIV 0.60
Generalized Chi-square 903.78 908.50
Generalized Chi-square/DF 0.28 0.29
N 3,210 3,210

Reference categories: Non-migrant’s wife; Does not worry of AIDS infection from husband; Network member is not married to migrant; Network member does not use prevention; Network member has not tested for HIV; Non-kin; Same age as ego; Different religion from ego’s; Network member would not loan money; Network member does not work; No education; Not working; In monogamous union; Does not reside with parents in-law; Zinc, polyurethane or block roof; Does not own cattle; No religion; Has not talked to husband about AIDS; Significance level: ** p < 0.01; * p <0.05; † p < 0.10.