Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar 28;10(4):1324–1341. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10041324

Table A1.

Sensitivity analyses, stepwise exclusion of individual welfare regimes in interactive models.

Variation Model 1 OR (95% CI) Model 2 OR (95% CI) Model 3 OR (95% CI) Model 4 OR (95% CI) Model 5 OR (95% CI) Model 6 OR (95% CI)
Male X
Welfare State
Male X SOU 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference) 1 (reference)
Male X CON - 0.75 (0.40–1.42) 1.20 (0.63–2.30) 0.83 (0.43–1.62) 0.82 (0.38–1.74) 0.77 (0.40–1.49)
Male X LIB 1.30 (0.74–2.30) - 1.82 (0.91–3.62) 1.15 (0.64–2.05) 1.21 (0.66–2.18) 1.29 (0.74–2.27)
Male X SD 1.65 (0.69–3.95) 1.04 (0.45–2.41) - 1.43 (0.59–3.46) 1.49 (0.60–3.70) 1.51 (0.66–3.44)
Male X SA 0.15 (0.07–0.32) 0.19 (0.09–0.39) 0.10 (0.04–0.25) - 0.17 (0.06–0.46) 0.18 (0.08–0.38)
Male X EE 0.40 (0.26–0.61) 0.42 (0.28–0.62) 0.31 (0.17–0.56) 0.40 (0.26–0.62) - 0.46 (0.30–0.71)
Male X LA 0.56 (0.29–1.12) 0.79 (0.41–1.52) 0.42 (0.19–0.93) 0.64 (0.32–1.28) 0.62 (0.30–1.29) -
Female X
Welfare State
Female X SOU 2.42 (1.86–3.15) 2.43 (1.86–3.16) 2.42 (1.85–3.15) 2.43 (1.86–3.17) 2.42 (1.86–3.15) 2.38 (1.84–3.08)
Female X CON - 1.42 (0.81–2.50) 2.28 (1.28–4.08) 1.59 (0.88–2.87) 1.56 (0.79–3.07) 1.49 (0.83–2.67)
Female X LIB 2.20 (1.27–3.80) - 3.06 (1.56–6.00) 1.93 (1.11–3.38) 2.03 (1.15–3.60) 2.13 (1.24–3.66)
Female X SD 1.97 (0.62–6.24) 1.25 (0.42–3.76) - 1.71 (0.55–5.30) 1.77 (0.53–5.92) 1.80 (0.59–5.45)
Female X SA 0.22 (0.09–0.50) 0.27 (0.12–0.61) 0.14 (0.05–0.38) - 0.24 (0.08–0.70) 0.25 (0.11–0.59)
Female X EE 0.79 (0.50–1.23) 0.83 (0.54–1.26) 0.61 (0.33–1.15) 0.80 (0.51–1.25) - 0.92 (0.59–1.45)
Female X LA 1.19 (0.61–2.32) 1.67 (0.88–3.17) 0.88 (0.40–1.93) 1.35 (0.69–2.65) 1.31 (0.64–2.68) -
Intercept 2.391 3.063 1.995 2.583 2.462 1.960
Variance 0.094 0.156 0.153 0.160 0.191 0.134
−2logL −18,202.482 −17,893.987 −18,481.133 −17,705.833 −18,240.581 −8,093.586
N 86,465 86,490 88,086 75,955 86,359 45,337

Notes: Models 1 to 6 exclude Conservative, Liberal, Social Democratic, Southeast Asia, Eastern European, and Latin American welfare regimes, respectively; All models adjust for age, educational attainment, marital status, GDP per capita and GDP annual growth rate (not shown); ORs and CIs in bold are significant at p < 0.05.