Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):132–137. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829752fc

Table 1.

Sample Characteristics

Forceps-Assisted Vaginal Delivery Without Rotation * (n=57) Forceps-Assisted Vaginal Delivery With Rotation (n=91) P
Maternal demographic characteristics
 Age, y 27.1 (±4.8) 27.6 (±6.2) 0.60
 Race
  Caucasian 38 (69.1) 63 (70.8) 0.88
  African American 12 (21.8) 20 (22.5)
  Other 5 (9.1)) 6 (6.7)
 Body mass index 30 or more kg/m2 30 (52.6) 46 (50.6) 0.81
 Gestational age, wk 38.4 (±2.8) 38.7 (±1.75) 0.35
 Nulliparous 45 (79.0) 71 (78.0) 0.89
 Insurance
  Private 35 (61.4) 42 (46.2) 0.07
  Medicaid 22 (38.6) 49 (53.9)
Obstetric and neonatal characteristics
 Epidural 53 (93.0) 80 (89.9) 0.69
 Episiotomy
  Midline 7 (12.3) 8 (8.8) 0.30
  Mediolateral 5 (8.8) 17 (18.7)
 Type of forceps
  Outlet 15 (26.3) 19 (21.0) 0.38
  Low 39 (68.4) 60 (65.9)
  Mid 1 (1.8) 7 (7.7)
 Neonatal weight, g 3250.2 (±683.9) 3214.2 (±534.8) 0.72
 1-minute neonatal Apgar 7 or less 14 (24.6) 20 (22.2) 0.74
 5-minute neonatal Apgar 7 or less 4 (7.0) 6 (6.7) 0.93
 Intrapartum complication 3 (5.3) 9 (9.9) 0.32
 Sulcal tear 16 (28.1) 28 (30.8) 0.73
 Severe perineal laceration 23 (43.4) 18 (24.3) 0.02

Data are n (%) or mean (± SD) unless otherwise specified.

Less than 5% missing data for all variables except severe perineal laceration with 8.6% missing data.

*

Delivery position was occiput posterior for all cases.

Delivery position was occiput anterior (81 cases), occiput posterior (9 cases) and occiput transverse (1 case).