Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 1;10(Summer):1a.

Table 5.

Comparison of Kappa Values across Studies

Kappa Values
Condition This Study Quan Studya Kieszak Studyb
Myocardial infarction 0.34 0.59 0.22
Congestive heart failure 0.61 0.80 0.38
Peripheral vascular disease 0.42 0.34 0.22
Cerebrovascular disease 0.83 0.50
Dementia 0.66 0.42 0.26
Chronic pulmonary disease 0.78 0.72 0.64
Hemiplegia/paraplegia 0.22 0.55
Rheumatologic disease 0.58 0.57 0.20
Peptic ulcer disease 0.62 0.63 0.12
Diabetes 0.75 0.74 0.68
Diabetes with chronic complication 0.34 0.58 0.16
Mild liver disease 0.09 0.53
Moderate liver disease 0.43 0.47
Renal disease 0.75 0.49 0.29
Any malignancy 0.77 0.78 0.23
Metastatic solid tumor 0.87 0.87 0.20
AIDS/HIV 0.91 0.78

Notes: Kappa categories: ≤0.2 (poor agreement); 0.21–0.40 (fair agreement); 0.41–0.60 (moderate agreement); 0.61–0.80 (substantial agreement); 0.81–1.00 (excellent agreement). Boldface values indicate kappa category higher than other studies.

a

Quan, H., G. A. Parsons, and W. A. Ghali. “Validity of Information on Comorbidity Derived from ICD-9-CM Administrative Data.” Medical Care 40 (2002): 675–85.

b

Kieszak, S. M., W. D. Flanders, A. S. Kosinski, C. C. Shipp, and H. Karp. “A Comparison of the Charlson Comorbidity Index Derived from Medical Record Data and Administrative Billing Data.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 52 (1999): 137–42; dash indicates conditions not studied.