Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 18;28(8):1020–1027. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2280-5

Table 3.

Percentage of Residents Very Satisfied with Clinic Element by Self-reported Likelihood of Entering GIM AS A RESULT of Clinic

Percent of residents very satisfied
Clinic domains and elements (n = 225) Likely to Enter GIM Unlikely to Enter GIM p value
n = 86 n = 139
n (%) n (%)
Clinical preceptors
Teaching ability 70 (82) 104 (75) 0.22
Timeliness of feedback 54 (66) 78 (57) 0.21
Fairness in evaluation 60 (77) 87 (67) 0.14
Being role models 73 (87) 96 (70) 0.004
Evidence-based clinical practice 66 (78) 86 (62) 0.01
Mentorship from faculty 64 (76) 72 (53) 0.001*
 
Educational environment
Degree of supervision 59 (69) 96 (69) 0.96
Preparation for clinical practice 46 (54) 61 (44) 0.14
Access to specialty expertise 29 (34) 106 (23) 0.06
Spectrum of patient problems/diseases 40 (47) 49 (35) 0.08
Degree of autonomy 73 (86) 101 (73) 0.02
 Enhancement of your clinical knowledge/skills 36 (43) 35 (25) 0.005
 
Ancillary staff
Front desk staff in your firm 34 (40) 55 (40) 0.95
 Nursing staff in your firm 64 (78) 106 (78) 0.98
 Medical assistant staff in your firm 53 (64) 87 (63) 0.90
 
Time management
 Number of clinic patients seen 28 (33) 20 (15) 0.001*
 Time allotted to see patients 24 (28) 15 (11) 0.001*
 Timely availability of follow-up appointments 24 (29) 22 (16) 0.02
 Timely availability of acute care appointments 29 (35) 27 (20) 0.01
 Ability to focus during clinic 27 (32) 23 (16) 0.007
 Ability to balance ward/inpatient duties on clinic days 16 (19) 16 (11) 0.12
 Time for learning 34 (40) 36 (26) 0.03
 Management of patient phone calls 13 (16) 14 (10) 0.24
 
Administrative: records/space
 Ease of getting patient records 19 (22) 32 (23) 0.91
 Amount of “paperwork” 11 (13) 14 (10) 0.51
 Patient record system 37 (44) 57 (41) 0.66
 Space for precepting with faculty 47 (55) 57 (41) 0.04
 
Personal experience
 Personal reward from work 43 (51) 32 (23) <0.001*
 Relationship with patients 54 (64) 59 (42) 0.002*
 Continuity of relationship with patients 48 (57) 45 (33) <0.001*
 Ownership/personal responsibility for patients' care 52 (62) 58 (42) 0.004
 Quality of care your patients receive 30 (35) 34 (24) 0.08

Differences calculated using chi-square test.

*

Significant at p ≤ 0.002 by Bonferonni correction