. 2013 Jul 15;3:2185. doi: 10.1038/srep02185

Table 1. Comparison of I–V parameters of solar cells fabricated using screen printing method and electroplating method (cell area: 154.8 cm²).

	J_sc^[a]	V_oc^[b]	R_s^[c]	R_sh^[d]	FF^[e]	η^[f]
Electroplating method	40.8	680	0.63	≥ 6,000	79.35	22.02
Screen printing method	40.8	672	1.11	≥ 10,000	74.26	20.30

[a] J_sc (mA/cm²): short-circuit current density, [b] V_oc (mV): open-circuit voltage, [c] R_s(Ωcm²): series resistance, [d] R_sh (Ωcm²): shunt resistance, [e] FF (%): fill factor, [f] η (%): cell efficiency

Table 1. Comparison of I–V parameters of solar cells fabricated using screen printing method and electroplating method (cell area: 154.8 cm2).

Table 1. Comparison of I–V parameters of solar cells fabricated using screen printing method and electroplating method (cell area: 154.8 cm²).