Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Res. 2012 Sep 11;42(1):59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.002

Table 5.

Bivariate and multivariate linear regression models of the standardized, negative dimensions of marital quality, comprising problems and disagreements (n=329).

Problems
Disagreements
Bivariate Models Full Model Bivariate Models Full Model
β (SE) β (SE) β (SE) β (SE)
Gender
 Male (ref) 0 0 0 0
 Female 0.01 (.11) 0.07 (.18) 0.51** (.11) 0.20 (.16)
Years of education 0.02 (.01) 0.03 (.02) −0.06** (.01) −0.03 (.02)
Who chose spouse
 Family (ref) 0 0 0 0
 Both family and respondent 0.14 (.13) 0.10 (.14) −0.14 (.13) −0.06 (.13)
 Respondent 0.05 (.14) 0.06 (.15) −0.30* (.14) −0.38** (.14)
Age at marriage 0.00 (.01) −0.01 (.02) −0.06** (.01) −0.03 (.02)
Marital duration −0.01 (.01) −0.02* (.01) −0.01 (.01) −0.02* (.01)
Number of children −0.01 (.03) 0.09 (.05) 0.04 (.03) 0.03 (.05)
Caste/ethnicity
 Chetri or Bahun (ref) 0 0 0 0
 Indigenous hill group −0.07 (.16) −0.04 (.16) 0.03 (.15) −0.00 (.15)
 Dalit −0.13 (.16) −0.08 (.20) 0.16 (.17) −0.05 (.18)
 Indigenous Terai group −0.13 (.13) −0.15 (.17) 0.53** (.13) 0.37* (.16)
Occupational status
 Does not work for pay (ref) 0 0 0 0
 Daily wage −0.03 (.16) −0.05 (.20) −0.52** (.16) −0.16 (.19)
 Salaried position 0.04 (.14) 0.04 (.19) −0.55** (.14) −0.12 (.18)
Constant various 0.12 (.50) various 0.72 (.46)

F-value various 0.79 various 5.22**
R2 various 0.03 various 0.17

p<0.10

*

p<0.05

**

p<0.01, two-tailed test