Skip to main content
. 2004 Apr;24(7):2734–2746. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.7.2734-2746.2004

TABLE 3.

Fidelity of WT and mutant pol η on TT dimer by steady-state kinetics

Enzyme Template:dNTPa Km (μM) kcat (min−1) kcat/Km (μM−1 min−1) fincb
S. cerevisiae pol η WT 3′-T:dATP 2.1 ± 1.3 7.5 ± 0.42 4.4 ± 1.9 1
3′-T:dGTP 130 ± 14 2.3 ± 0.16 0.018 ± 0.0029 4.0 × 10−3
3′-T:dCTP 330 ± 160 0.37 ± 0.13 (1.2 ± 0.15) × 10−3 2.6 × 10−4
3′-T:dTTP 210 ± 83 1.8 ± 0.16 (9.8 ± 5.5) × 10−3 2.2 × 10−3
3′-CPD:dATP 6.0 ± 2.3 5.7 ± 0.76 1.1 ± 0.46 0.24
S. cerevisiae pol η F34L 3′-T:dATP 460 ± 43 2.6 ± 0.30 (5.7 ± 0.14) × 10−3 1
3′-T:dGTP 1,100 ± 150 (7.5 ± 0.80) × 10−3 (7.1 ± 0.53) × 10−6 1.3 × 10−3
3′-T:dCTP NDc ND ND ND
3′-T:dTTP ND ND ND ND
3′-CPD:dATP 600 ± 140 0.16 ± 0.023 (2.8 ± 0.33) × 10−4 0.048
a

Template and dNTP represent template base and incoming dNTP, respectively. The name of each template site is schematically illustrated in Fig. 1.

b

finc, kcat/Km value relative to that for T:dATP (which was set at 1.0).

c

ND, incorporation was below the detection limit and thus was not detected.