Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 17;33(16):6742–6752. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0528-13.2013

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

arg+/−α3+/− mice have decreased synapse density, disrupted synaptic ultrastructure, and abnormal behavior. A, Representative electron micrographs of hippocampal SC–CA1 synapses from P42 WT and arg+/−α3+/− mice. Scale bar, 200 nm. B, Mean synapse density is reduced in arg+/−α3+/− mice compared with WT littermates at P42 but not P21. ANOVA between groups: F = 8.983, p < 0.0001. Post hoc Student's t test: P21, p = 0.6427; P42, p < 0.0001. n = 33–52 sections from 3–4 mice per group. C, Mean PSD length is increased in arg+/−α3+/− synapses compared with WT littermates at P42. At P21, arg+/−α3+/− synapses have an increased PSD length compared with WT, although it was not statistically significant. ANOVA between groups: F = 5.218, p = 0.0015. Post hoc Student's t test: P21, p = 0.0689; P42, p = 0.0015. n = 75–112 synapses from 3–4 mice per group. D, Mean dendritic spine cross-sectional head area fails to decrease in arg+/−α3+/− synapses between P21 and P42 compared with WT littermates. ANOVA between groups: F = 6.519, p = 0.0003. Post hoc Student's t test: P21, p = 0.6215; P42, p = 0.0008. Additionally, the variance in WT spine head areas decreases between P21 and P42, but there is no difference in arg+/−α3+/− spine head area variance between the two ages. Two-sampled F test: WT, p < 0.0001; arg+/−α3+/−, p = 0.7255. n = 75–112 synapses from 3–4 mice per group. E, Performance of WT, arg+/−, α3+/−, arg+/−α3+/−, α5+/−, and arg+/−α5+/− mice in an object recognition task at P42. On day 1, exploration time of two identical objects is identical in all genotypes. Here, all genotypes show a preference for the novel object (white bar) on day 3 of testing, except arg+/−α3+/− mice who spend equal time with the novel object and familiar object from day 1 (black bar). Three-way ANOVA (object × arg × integrin): F = 3.868, p = 0.023; main effect of object, F = 160.091, p < 0.001. Post hoc Student's t test: WT, p < 0.0001, n = 22 mice; arg+/−, p < 0.0001, n = 17 mice; α3+/−, p < 0.0001, n = 11 mice; arg+/−α3+/−, p = 0.0724, n = 8 mice; α5+/−, p < 0.0001, n = 9 mice; arg+/−α5+/−, p < 0.0001, n = 9 mice. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05.