Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Brain Res. 2013 Apr 21;227(2):249–261. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3507-3

Table 1.

Effect of stimulus type on the Temporal Binding Window

2-way ANOVA Main effect of stimulus type Left TBW Right TBW Whole TBW
p < F p < F p < F
50% criterion 1.00e−15 53.74 1.00e−13 40.72 1.00e−15 53.68
70% criterion 1.00e−13 39.14 0.02 4.22 1.00e−8 31.72

Follow-up t-tests
Stimulus comparison
Left TBW Right TBW Whole TBW
Task p < T p < t p < T

Flashbeep vs Tools Collapsed n.s. 1.89 n.s. 1.91 n.s. 0.13
SJa n.s. 1.65 n.s. 1.40 n.s. 0.05
TOJ n.s. 1.98 n.s. 2.00 n.s. 1.99
PF 0.03 2.31 n.s. 1.18 n.s. 0.75
SJi n.s. 1.91 n.s. 1.91 n.s. 1.91

Flashbeep vs Speech Collapsed 5.71e−12 7.74 1.29e−3 3.31 4.92e−17 9.99
SJa 3.39e−3 3.01 n.s. 0.34 9.07e−7 5.26
TOJ 1.30e−3 3.59 1.33e−3 3.58 1.32e−3 3.58
PF 1.38e−4 4.54 n.s. 0.34 7.37e−5 4.70
SJi 4.56e−7 7.04 4.47e−7 7.05 4.52e−7 7.05

Tools vs Speech Collapsed 7.35e−9 6.28 2.50e−6 4.97 1.46e−13 8.46
SJa 0.02 2.44 9.91e−3 2.63 2.01e−5 4.49
TOJ 3.38e−5 4.96 3.35e−5 4.97 3.36e−5 4.96
PF 0.04 2.23 n.s. 0.80 6.06e−3 2.99
SJi 1.23e−4 4.65 1.21e−4 4.66 1.22e−4 4.66