Table 1.
Summary of Statistical Tests
| A | Contrast | Original Task | Low Urgency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SEM | Mean ± SEM | ||
| Accuracy (%) | 90 | 95 ± 0.8 | 93 ± 0.8 |
| 60 | 91 ± 0.8 | 87 ± 0.8 | |
| 36 | 82 ± 2.3 | 79 ± 2.3 | |
| 12 | 58 ± 1.9 | 59 ± 1.9 | |
| OSD (ms) | 90 | 240 ± 22 | 279 ± 22 |
| 60 | 238 ± 24 | 286 ± 24 | |
| 36 | 244 ± 23 | 296 ± 23 | |
| 12 | 246 ± 23 | 305 ± 23 | |
| Avg | 242 ± 23 | 291 ± 23 | |
| MT (ms) | 90 | 287 ± 10 | 565 ± 10 |
| 60 | 280 ± 10 | 556 ± 10 | |
| 36 | 279 ± 10 | 558 ± 10 | |
| 12 | 290 ± 13 | 551 ± 13 | |
| Avg | 284 ± 3 | 557 ± 3 |
| B | Test Task | Original Task
|
Low Urgency
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low Urgency | Punished Errors | Task Water Only | Task Water Plus | Fixed Go Signal | Blocked Stimuli | ||
| Baseline task | Original task | Original task | Control group | Control group | Original task | Interleaved stimuli | |
|
| |||||||
| Figure | 1D and 1E | 2Aii and 2Aiii | 2B | 2B | 3C and 3D | 5A–5C | |
|
| |||||||
| Accuracy | Difficulty | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
|
| |||||||
| Task | 0.4 | 0.0153 | 0.16 | 0.017 | 0.0688 | +++** | |
|
| |||||||
| Both | 0.8 | 0.28 | 0.81 | 0.98 | 0.0095 | 00115 | |
|
| |||||||
| OSD | Difficulty | 0.83/+++* | 1 | 0.71 | 0.53 | 0.0145 | 0.57 |
|
| |||||||
| Task | +++ | +++ | 0.35 | 0.27 | +++ | 0.58 | |
|
| |||||||
| Both | 0.98 | 0.95 | 1 | 0.99 | 0.9 | 0.51 | |
|
| |||||||
| MT | Difficulty | 0.9998 | 0.93 | 0.9 | 0.87 | 0.99 | 0.42 |
|
| |||||||
| Task | +++ | +++ | 0.2276 | 0.0584 | 0.79 | 0.65 | |
|
| |||||||
| Both | 0.9996 | 0.96 | 0.9962 | 0.98 | 1 | 0.6 | |
(A) Mean accuracy, mean of median OSD and MT values of individual rats (±SEM) across sessions in original and low-urgency tasks. Averages across rats shown here are plotted in Figure 1.
(B) For six different task manipulations (rows), we analyzed three dependent variables—(1) performance accuracy (Accuracy), (2) median odor sampling duration (OSD), and (3) median movement time (MT)—in two different conditions (Test Task and Baseline Task). The figure associated with each comparison is indicated (row “Figure”). For each case, we performed a two-way ANOVA with mixture contrast (Difficulty) as one independent variable and the task condition (Task) as the other. Significance values are reported for the dependence of each dependent variable on each independent variable with values of p < 0.001 indicated as “+++.” For each comparison a different set of rats (n = 4) was tested in each the two conditions, except for the Blocked Stimuli comparison, in which the same rats (n = 6 rats) were tested with blocked and interleaved stimuli. Significant difference is indicated by (*) for p < 0.001 Friedman test for paired samples and (**) for p = 0.0086 Wilcoxon rank test (12% and 36% mixture contrast).