Abstract
The formation of interstrand cross-links in nucleic acids can have a strong impact on biological function of nucleic acids; therefore, many cross-linking agents have been developed for biological applications. Despite numerous studies, there remains a need for cross-linking agents that exhibit both efficiency and selectivity. In this study, a 4-vinyl-substituted analog of thymidine (T-vinyl derivative) was designed as a new cross-linking agent, in which the vinyl group is oriented towards the Watson–Crick face to react with the amino group of an adenine base. The interstrand cross-link formed rapidly and selectively with a uridine on the RNA substrate at the site opposite to the T-vinyl derivative. A detailed analysis of cross-link formation while varying the flanking bases of the RNA substrates indicated that interstrand cross-link formation is preferential for the adenine base on the 5′-side of the opposing uridine. In the absence of a 5′-adenine, a uridine at the opposite position underwent cross-linking. The oligodeoxynucleotides probe incorporating the T-vinyl derivative efficiently formed interstrand cross-links in parallel-type triplex DNA with high selectivity for dA in the homopurine strand. The efficiency and selectivity of the T-vinyl derivative illustrate its potential use as a unique tool in biological and materials research.
INTRODUCTION
Many chemical entities, of either exogenous or endogenous origins, cause the alkylation of or damage to DNA and RNA; thus, they have a strong impact on biological functions of nucleic acids (1–3). Chemotherapeutic agents, such as mitomycin C, exert their effects by the alkylation of DNA (4). On UV irradiation, psoralen forms DNA adducts with both duplex strands to form an interstrand cross-link. This compound is widely used for therapy (5) and mechanistic studies of processes, such as DNA repair (6). The enhanced inhibition of translation by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) has been demonstrated by the cross-link formation between psoralen and target RNA (7,8). Cross-link formation is also used to maintain 3D nucleic acid structures (9–11). A variety of functional groups have also been developed to enable interstrand cross-linking, including disulfide bonds (12), benzophenone derivatives (13), carbazoles (14), quinone methides (15,16), phenylselenyl derivatives of pyrimidines (17) and furan derivatives (18). To further advance these studies, an efficient cross-linking method is still desired.
To address the need for an efficient cross-linking agent, we previously developed a 2-amino-6-vinylpurine derivative (1) based on a hybridization-assisted strategy. This compound exhibited efficient and selective cross-linking to cytosine bases (19–25). The close proximity of the vinyl group to the cytosine base in the hybridized complex contributed to the high reactivity of 1 (Figure 1). An ODN incorporating a sulfide-protected derivative of 2-amino-6-vinylpurine was shown to be useful for inhibiting and modulating intracellular gene expression (26). A characteristic feature of this 2-amino-6-vinylpurine is that the vinyl group is directed towards the Watson–Crick base pairing face to react with the 4-amino group of cytosine. Generally, the reactive group for cross-link formation is not located near the Watson–Crick face. The efficient cross-link formation by 1 suggests that partial base pairing and/or shape complementarity can benefit from a proximity effect. Further efforts have continued towards the biological applications and improvement of the 2-amino-6-vinylpurine unit (27–30). In this study, newly designed 4-vinylpyrimidine-2-one nucleoside analogs (T-vinyl 2 and U-vinyl 3) have been shown to exhibit fast and selective cross-link formation with either adenine or uracil bases, depending on the target sequence. Herein, we describe in detail the synthesis of nucleoside analogs 2 and 3, evaluation of their cross-linking reactivity, analysis of the cross-linked products derived from 2 and highlight its potential application for cross-linking in triplex DNA.
Figure 1.
The 2-amino-6-vinylpurine derivative (1) for cross-linking with cytosine and newly designed 4-vinyl substituted pyrimidine derivatives, T-vinyl (2) and U-vinyl (3).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The 4-vinyl-(1H)-5-methylpyrimidine-2-one derivative (2) was designed for cross-link formation with the 6-amino group of adenine, based on the expectation that the two bases would exhibit shape-complementarity resembling a T–A base pair. A similar derivative lacking the 5-methyl group (3) was also synthesized for comparison. The synthesis of the nucleoside units and their incorporation into ODNs are shown in Scheme 1. The syntheses described herein are an extension of earlier reports from this group concerning the introduction of a vinyl group via Suzuki–Miyaura coupling. The 2,4,6-triisopropylbenzensulfonyl derivative of tert-butyldimethylsilyl (TBDMS)-protected thymidine (7) or 2′-deoxyuridine (8) was treated with 2,4,6-trivinylcyclotriboroxane pyridine complex in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4, LiBr and K2CO3 in H2O-dioxane. As the resulting vinylated products (9 and 10) were not sufficiently stable for isolation, they were isolated after protection with octanethiol (11 and 12) (31). They were then converted to the corresponding phosphoramidite precursors (13 and 14) using conventional methods and were then used in a DNA/RNA automated synthesizer to incorporate 2 or 3 into ODN1 and ODN2 with flanking bases (M5 and M3). Initially, vinyl derivative (9) was protected with methanethiol. However, the methylsulfide protecting group was cleaved during the reaction with DMTrCl and resulted in a complex mixture. This problem was overcome by protecting the vinyl group with octanethiol. Additionally, thioanisole was required as a scavenger for the DMTr cation during protection with DMTrCl. The ODNs thus synthesized were cleaved from the resin by treatment with a solution of K2CO3 in dry methanol in the presence of octanethiol. After HPLC purification, the DMTr group was deprotected in 5% aqueous AcOH solution, and the deprotected ODNs were again purified using HPLC to produce the octylsulfide-protected ODNs (1 and 2). The octylsulfide group was oxidized with magnesium metaperoxyphthalate (MMPP) in carbonate buffer, and the resulting sulfoxide derivatives were treated with 0.5 M NaOH solution to generate the vinyl group, thus providing the cross-linking ODNs (3,4 and 5) in good yields. The vinyl group of ODN was hydrated with a half-life of ∼4 h at 25°C and pH 7.0.
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of 4-vinyl-(1H)-pyrimidine-2-one derivatives (2 and 3)a. (a) (i) TBDMSCl, imidazole, N,N-dimethylformamide, 94% and (ii) 2,4,6-triisopropylbenzensulfonyl chloride, Et3N, N,N-dimethyl-4-aminopyridine, CH2Cl2, 93%; (b) 2,4,6-trivinylcyclotriboroxane pyridine complex, Pd(PPh3)4, LiBr, K2CO3, H2O:1,4-dioxane = 1:3 solution; (c) C8H17SH, CH3CN, 94% (2 steps); (d) (i) tetrabutylammonium fluoride, tetrahydrofuran, 79%, (ii) DMTrCl, thioanisole, N,N-Diisopropylethylamine (DIPEA), CH2Cl2, 88% and (iii) 2-cyanoethyl N,N-diisopropylchlorophosphoramidite, DIPEA, CH2Cl2, 72%; (e) (i) DNA/RNA synthesizer, (ii) K2CO3 in dry methanol in the presence of octanethiol and (iii) 5% aqueous AcOH; and (f) (i) MMPP carbonate buffer, and (ii) 0.5 M NaOH.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Evaluation of the cross-linking reaction
The vinyl-ODNs (3 and 4) obtained were used for the cross-linking reaction with the target RNA1 having different nucleoside residues at the complementary positions (Figure 2). Surprisingly, the cross-linking reaction of ODN3 (R = CH3) to the RNA1 with U at the opposite position (X = U) was complete within 15 min (Figure 2A). The RNA1 with an opposing G or A (X = G or A) showed lower reactivity, whereas the RNA1 with an opposing C (X = C) did not form any appreciable cross-link product. Interestingly, ODN4 (R = H) containing U-vinyl 3 showed much slower reaction rates while retaining the selectivity for U (Figure 2B). Using Arrhenius plots, kinetic parameters for the cross-linking reactions were obtained, which indicated that T-vinyl (2) is superior to U-vinyl (3), as indicated by the smaller negative value of activation entropy (Supplementary Figure S6 and Supplementary Table S1). It is reasonable to interpret from this result that the vinyl group of the T-vinyl (R = CH3) requires less conformational change than that of the U-vinyl (R = H) for cross-link formation to occur. This interpretation is supported by molecular orbital calculations (B3LYP/6-31G*); a syn-conformation (15), in which the vinyl group is directed towards the Watson–Crick face, is 2.57 kcal/mol more stable than the anti-conformation (16) of T-vinyl (R = CH3), whereas this conformation is only 0.52 kcal/mol more stable in the U-vinyl (R = H) (Figure 3 and Supplementary Figure S6C and D). The 5-methyl group on the T-vinyl (2) plays a role in directing the vinyl group to the Watson–Crick face by steric repulsion.
Figure 2.
Cross-linking reaction with ODN3,4 and RNA1. Cross-linking conditions: [ODN3 or 4] = 10 µM, RNA1 = 1 µM, 50 mM MES buffer, 100 mM NaCl, 37°C, pH 7.0. The reaction was followed by electrophoresis using 15% denatured polyacrylamide gel. The fast- and slow-moving bands represent RNA1 and the cross-linked products, respectively. The cross-link yield was obtained by quantification of the bands by FAM fluorescence (λem = 518 nm, λex = 494 nm), and it was plotted against time. (A) Yield obtained with ODN3 (R = CH3). (B) Yield obtained with ODN4 (R = H). (C) An example of gel-shift analysis of the reaction with ODN3 (R = CH3).
Figure 3.
A syn- (15) and an anti-conformation (16) of the vinyl-substituted derivative.
Although this new cross-linking agent was designed for reaction with an adenine base, both T–(2) and U-vinyl (3) showed selectivity for target RNAs having U at the complementary site. To examine the effect of duplex stability on selectivity, Tm values were measured for each duplex. For this purpose, the vinyl group of ODN3 (R = CH3) was reduced with NaBH4 to give a non-reactive ODN that had an ethyl group instead of a vinyl group (Supplementary Figure S4). The Tm values for the duplexes formed between reduced ODN3 and RNA1 (X = U, G, A and C) were determined to be 42.2°C (X = U), 43.5°C (X = A), 49.4°C (X = G) and 41.5°C (X = C), indicating that the cross-linking reaction took place at temperatures lower than the Tm values, and that the selectivity was not reflective of the Tm value (Supplementary Figure S5). To gain insight into the cross-linking reaction, it was monitored using HPLC. The reaction mixture at pH 7 gave two major peaks at ∼12 min, both of which were confirmed to be the cross-linked products by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight (MALDI-TOF)/MS (Figure 4 and Supplementary Table S2). The faster peak became predominant after the reaction at pH 5, whereas the slower peak dominated at pH 9. The cross-link peaks were isolated and subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis using bacterial alkaline phosphatase, venom phosphodiesterase and P1 nuclease for the HPLC analysis of the product structure. Interestingly, the faster peak produced an adenosine adduct [electrospray ionization (ESI)-MS m/e calcd 520.22 (M + H)+, found 520.07]; in contrast, the slower peak gave a uridine adduct (ESI-MS m/e calcd 497.19 [M + H]+, found 497.30). As DNA substrates showed base selectivity and the pH-dependence of the corresponding HPLC profile similar to those of RNA substrates (Supplementary Figure S7), DNA substrates were used for more detailed analysis. The authentic adducts with dA and T were synthesized by adding tert-butyldimethylsilyl (TBS)-protected dA or T during the synthesis of 9 (Supplementary Schemes S2 and S3). Their structures were confirmed by 1H–1H correlation spectroscopy for 17 (Supplementary Figure S1) or 1H–13C hetero-nuclear multiple-bond connectivity for 18 (Supplementary Figure S2). An HPLC comparison with authentic 17 confirmed that the cross-link was predominantly formed with the 6-amino group of dA at acidic pH (Figure 5A). Conversely, Figure 5B clearly shows that the cross-link was formed at the N3 atom of T (18) at alkaline pH (Figure 5B). These results suggest that the reactivity of the vinyl group of 2 is affected by the pH of the reaction medium.
Figure 4.
HPLC trace of the cross-linking reaction using ODN3 and non-labeled RNA1 (X = U). Cross-linking conditions: [ODN3] = 15 µM, RNA1 = 10 mM, 50 mM MES buffer, 100 mM NaCl, 37°C, pH 5 or pH 7. The reaction at pH9 was performed in 50 mM carbonate buffer. HPLC conditions: column SHISEIDO C18, 4.6 × 250 mm; solvent A 0.1 M TEAA buffer, solvent B CH3CN, B 10–20% /20 min 20–100%/25 min, linear gradient; flow rate 1.0 ml/min; UV 254 nm. Each peak was assigned to the A- or U-cross-link, as described in the text. MMPP used for preparation of ODN3 appeared in HPLC chart.
Figure 5.
HPLC analysis of the enzymatic hydrolyzates of the cross-linked products obtained at pH 5 (A) and those obtained at pH9 (B). The peaks appearing at ∼15 min in each chart showed identical retention times and MSs with those corresponding to the authentic samples (17 and 18).
Determination of the cross-linked products
As two adenosine residues flank the opposing uridine in the target RNA1, it is necessary to determine which of these adenosine residues is responsible for cross-link formation. Accordingly, cross-link formation was analyzed using all 16 possible combinations of RNA2 (N3-U-N5) with various 3′-, 5′-flanking nucleotide relative to U and the complementary ODN5 (M5-2-M3) (Figure 6). The yields of the A- and U-adducts were determined using an HPLC analysis of the reaction and the enzymatic hydrolyzates of the isolated products (Supplementary Figure S8). It should be noted that cross-link formation predominantly occurred with an adenine residue at the 5′ position relative to U (striped columns in lanes 1–4). The adenosine residue at the 3′ position did not undergo cross-linking (lanes 5, 9 and 13). Cross-link formation with the opposing U was slower than with A at the 5′-position (white columns in lanes 5–16); however, yields ∼80% were obtained after 60 min (Figure 6B).
Figure 6.
The ratio of A- to U-cross-linking at 5 and 60 min. The ratio was determined using HPLC. The cross-linking conditions were [ODN5] = 15 µM, [RNA2] = 10 µM, 50 mM MES buffer, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.0, 37°C. Flanking nucleosides M3 and M5 of ODN5 are complementary to N5 and N3, respectively.
Because having a U residue opposite to T-vinyl 2 is important for efficient cross-link formation with a 5′-A, it may be postulated that this uracil base plays a role in maintaining the duplex structure. As the distance between the T-vinyl derivative and U is too far for direct H-bond formation, we speculate that a bridging water molecule may be important for this H-bonding interaction, as shown in 19 (Figure 7). Such bridging water molecules were shown to contribute to the formation of a U–C base pair in a crystal structure, thus highlighting this interaction (32,33). Molecular modeling (Supplementary Figure S9) indicates that the 6-amino group of the adenine residue at the 5′ side is in van der Waals contact with the vinyl group of 2, as shown schematically in 20 (Figure 7). The fact that the cross-link reaction was faster at pH 5 might imply that protonation at the N3 atom of 2 increases the reactivity of the vinyl group towards the 6-amino group of 5′-A, which is in close proximity. RNA2 lacking a 5′-A formed a cross-link with the N3 atom of the opposite U (Figure 6B), most likely by reaction with its enol or enolate form (Figure 7, 21). Cross-link formation with an opposing U decreased at pH 5 (Figure 4), probably because of low reactivity of its keto form as a major component. The enolate form may also contribute to the selective cross-link formation with an opposing U at pH 9 (Figure 4).
Figure 7.
Speculated hydrogen bonds between T-vinyl 2 and a uracil base. A bridging water molecule was assumed in 19. A close proximity between 6-NH2 of 5′-A is shown schematically in 20. The cross-link formed with the N3 of the opposite U likely by the reaction with its enol or enolate form as shown in 21.
Cross-link formation within triplex DNA
We next investigated cross-link formation in triplex DNA. ODN3 contains T-vinyl 2 in the homopyrimidine strand and can, therefore, form triplex DNA with a homopurine–homopyrimidine duplex. ODN6 contains 5-methylcytidine (dmC) instead of dC, which is used for triplex formation under weakly acidic conditions. The target duplex was prepared using DNA1 and DNA2, either of which was labeled with 6-carboxyfluorescein-aminohexyl (FAM) to clarify the cross-linked strand. Figure 7A illustrates gel analysis of the reaction between ODN3 and the duplex formed with FAM-labeled DNA1 and non-labeled DNA2. Slow mobility bands were formed only in the reaction with the duplex containing XY = AT. Efficiency and selectivity were clearly demonstrated by examining the time course of the reaction (Figure 8B). When the duplex was formed with non-labeled DNA1 and FAM-labeled DNA2, no slow mobility bands were observed (Figure 8C). In addition, FAM–DNA1 alone did not produce the slow mobility bands, clearly indicating that cross-link formation took place with DNA1 in the triplex. This was also confirmed by an HPLC analysis of the cross-linking reaction medium using non-labeled DNA1 and DNA2. The ODN3 and DNA1 peaks disappeared, whereas the DNA2 peak remained and the cross-linked product appeared at ∼15 min in the HPLC profile (Figure 9A). As the reaction was performed at acidic conditions, the hydration reaction of the vinyl group of ODN3 took place rapidly to produce side products observed between the peaks of DNA1 and 2. The cross-linked product was subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis and HPLC analysis to demonstrate that the cross-link was formed with the 6-amino group of adenine (Figure 5, 17). ODN6, containing dmC instead of dC, produced the cross-link at weakly acidic pH, whereas no adduct was formed with ODN3 under the same conditions (Supplementary Figure S10). As a protonated dC is responsible for the formation of triplex DNA containing CGC base triplets (Figure 9, 22), and dmC is protonated at weakly acidic pH, these results also support that cross-link formation takes place in the triplex DNA. The reactivity of the vinyl group is enhanced at acidic pH because of protonation at N3; therefore, such a protonated form might contribute to the access of the vinyl group to 6-NH2 of the adenosine residue in the homopurine strand as depicted in 23 (Figure 9B).
Figure 8.
Evaluation of triplex cross-linking. Cross-linking conditions, [ODN3 or ODN6] = 25 µM, [DNA1/DNA2] = 5 µM, 50 mM MES buffer, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 25°C, pH 5.0 (C = dC) or pH 6.1 (C = dmC). (A) Electrophoresis, 15% denatured polyacrylamide gel. The reaction was checked at 0, 5, 15, 30 and 60 min. (B) The yield of the cross-linked product was obtained using FAM-labeled DNA1. (C) The yield was obtained using FAM-labeled DNA2.
Figure 9.
(A) HPLC analysis of cross-link formation in the triplex DNA. The reaction was done using ODN3 (30 μM) and DNA1 and 2 (10 μM each) in 50 mM MES buffer (pH 5.0), including 100 mM NaCl and 10 mM MgCl2 at 25°C for 1 h (B) Expected complex structures in the triplex DNA between a protonated C and a GC pair (22) and that between a protonated 2 and an AT pair (23). MMPP used for preparation of ODN3 appeared in HPLC chart.
CONCLUSION
Analogues of thymidine (T-vinyl, 2) and 2′-deoxyuridine (U-vinyl, 3) containing 4-vinyl-sustituents were designed as new cross-linking agents. In these compounds, the vinyl group is oriented towards the Watson–Crick face to facilitate a reaction with the amino group of the adenine base. ODN containing 2 or 3 exhibited rapid cross-link formation with RNA substrates containing U at the position opposite to 2 or 3. In the case of RNA1 (X = U) containing A at the 5′ side of U, a cross-link formed with the 6-amino group of the 5′-A. RNA1 (X = U) lacking 5′-A formed a cross-link with the N3 atom of a U at the opposing position. T-vinyl (2) showed more efficient reactivity than U-vinyl (3), most likely because the direction of the vinyl group of T-vinyl is pre-organized towards the Watson–Crick face by the steric bulkiness of the 5-methyl group. The ODN probe incorporating 2 efficiently formed interstrand cross-links in parallel-type triplex DNA with high selectivity for dA in the homopurine strand. Thus, the efficiency of the cross-linking reaction of 2 has been demonstrated for DNA/RNA, DNA/DNA duplexes and triplex DNA. The efficiency and selectivity suggest that T-vinyl 2 may become a unique tool in biological and materials research.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online: Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, Supplementary Figures 1–10 and Supplementary Schemes 1–3.
FUNDING
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) [21229002] from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS); CREST from the Japan Science and Technology Agency. Funding for open access charge: Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) [21229002] from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
Supplementary Material
REFERENCES
- 1.Jackson SP, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature. 2009;461:1071–1078. doi: 10.1038/nature08467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stone MP, Huang H, Brown KL, Shanmugam G. Chemistry and structural biology of DNA damage and biological consequences. Chem. Biodivers. 2011;8:1571–1615. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201100033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jena NR. DNA damage by reactive species: mechanisms, mutation and repair. J. Biosci. 2012;37:503–517. doi: 10.1007/s12038-012-9218-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Motgomery JA. Agents that react with DNA. In: Foye WO, editor. Cancer Chemotherapeutic Agents. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society; 1995. pp. 111–204. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Toussaint M, Levasseur G, Tremblay M, Paquette M, Conconi A. Psoralen photocrosslinking, a tool to study the chromatin structure of RNA polymerase I–transcribed ribosomal genes. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2005;83:449–459. doi: 10.1139/o05-141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Grillari J, Katinger H, Voglauer R. Contributions of DNA interstrand cross-links to aging of cells and organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:7566–7576. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Murakami A, Yamayoshi A, Iwase R, Nishida J, Yamaoka T, Wake N. Photodynamic antisense regulation of human cervical carcinoma cell growth using psoralen-conjugated oligo(nucleoside phosphorothioate) Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2001;13:25–34. doi: 10.1016/s0928-0987(00)00204-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Higuchi M, Kobori A, Yamayoshi A, Murakami A. Synthesis of antisense oligonucleotides containing 2′-O-psoralenylmethoxyalkyl adenosine for photodynamic regulation of point mutations in RNA. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009;17:475–483. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li Y, Tseng YD, Kwon SY, D’Espaux L, Bunch JS, McEuen PL, Luo D. Controlled assembly of dendrimer-like DNA. Nat. Mater. 2004;3:38–42. doi: 10.1038/nmat1045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tagawa M, Shohda K, Fujimoto K, Suyama A. Stabilization of DNA nanostructures by photo-cross-linking. Soft Matter. 2011;7:10931. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rajendran A, Endo M, Katsuda Y, Hidaka K, Sugiyama H. Photo-cross-linking-assisted thermal stability of DNA origami structures and its application for higher-temperature self-assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:14488–14491. doi: 10.1021/ja204546h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Glick GD. Engineering terminal disulfide bonds into DNA. In: Beaucage SL, et al., editors. Current Protocols in Nucleic Acid Chemistry. 2003. Chapter 5, Unit 5.7, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nakatani K, Yoshida T, Saito I. Photochemistry of benzophenone immobilized in a major groove of DNA: formation of thermally reversible interstrand cross-link. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:2118–2119. doi: 10.1021/ja017611r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fujimoto K, Konishi-Hiratsuka K, Sakamoto T, Yoshimura Y. Site-specific photochemical RNA editing. Chem. Commun. 2010;46:7545–7547. doi: 10.1039/c0cc03151h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhou Q, Rokita SE. A general strategy for target-promoted alkylation in biological systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:15452–15457. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2533112100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rokita SE. Reversible alkylation of DNA by quinone methides. In: Rokita SE, editor. Quinone Methides. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2009. pp. 297–327. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Peng X, Hong IS, Li H, Seidman MM, Greenberg MM. Interstrand cross-link formation in duplex and triplex DNA by modified pyrimidines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:10299–10306. doi: 10.1021/ja802177u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Op de Beeck M, Madder A. Sequence specific DNA cross-linking triggered by visible light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:10737–10740. doi: 10.1021/ja301901p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nagatsugi F, Kawasaki T, Usi D, Maeda M, Sasaki S. Highly efficient and selective cross-linking to cytidine based on the new strategy for auto-activation within duplex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:6753–6754. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nagatsugi F, Tokuda N, Maeda M, Sasaki S. A new reactive nucleoside analogue for highly reactive and selective cross-linking reaction to cytidine under neutral conditions. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001;11:2577–2579. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(01)00505-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nagatsugi F, Usui D, Kawasaki T, Maeda M, Sasaki S. Selective reaction to a flipping cytidine of the duplex DNA mediated by triple helix formation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001;11:343–345. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(00)00666-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nagatsugi F, Matsuyama Y, Maeda M, Sasaki S. Selective cross-linking to the adenine of the TA interrupting site within the triple helix. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002;12:487–489. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(01)00783-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kawasaki T, Nagatsugi F, Ali MM, Maeda M, Sugiyama K, Hori K, Sasaki S. Hybridization-promoted and cytidine-selective activation for cross-linking with the use of 2-amino-6-vinylpurine derivatives. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:14–23. doi: 10.1021/jo048298p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sasaki S, Nagatsugi F. Application of unnatural oligonucleotides to chemical modification of gene expression. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2006;10:615–621. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nagatsugi F, Imoto S. Induced cross-linking reactions to target genes using modified oligonucleotides. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011;9:2579–2585. doi: 10.1039/c0ob00819b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ali MM, Oishi M, Nagatsugi F, Mori K, Nagasaki Y, Kataoka K, Sasaki S. Intracellular ability of an inducible alkylation system to exhibit antisense effects with greater potency and selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2006;45:3136–3140. doi: 10.1002/anie.200504441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nagatsugi F, Sasaki S, Miller PS, Seidman MM. Site-specific mutagenesis by triple-helix forming oligonucleotides containing a reactive nucleoside analogue. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:e31. doi: 10.1093/nar/gng031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Taniguchi Y, Kurose Y, Nishioka T, Nagatsugi F, Sasaki S. The alkyl-connected 2-amino-6-vinylpurine (avp) crosslinking agent for improved selectivity to the cytosine. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010;18:2894–2901. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Imoto S, Hori T, Hagihara S, Taniguchi Y, Sasaki S, Nagatsugi F. Alteration of cross-linking selectivity with the 2′-ome analogue of 2-amino-6-vinylpurine and evaluation of antisense effect. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010;20:6121–6124. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Imoto S, Chikuni T, Kansui H, Kunieda T, Nagatsugi F. Fast DNA interstrand cross-linking reaction by 6-vinylpurine. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2012;31:752–762. doi: 10.1080/15257770.2012.726756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hattori K, Hirohama T, Imoto S, Kusano S, Nagatsugi F. Formation of highly selective and efficient interstrand cross-linking to thymine without photo-irradiation. Chem. Commun. 2009:6463–6465. doi: 10.1039/b915381k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Holbrook SR, Cheong C, Tinoco I, Kim SH. Crystal structure of an RNA double helix incorporating a track of non-Watson-Crick base pairs. Nature. 1991;353:579–581. doi: 10.1038/353579a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cruse WB, Saludjian P, Biala E, Strazewski P, Prangé T, Kennard O. Structure of a mispaired RNA double helix at 1.6-A resolution and implications for the prediction of RNA secondary structure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1994;91:4160–4164. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.10.4160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.