Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Abus. 2013 Jul-Sep;34(3):298–305. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2013.775092

Table 2.

Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) of marijuana use trajectory groups to predict work commitment, financial stability, and social environment

T5 Marijuana use trajectory groups
Chronic vs. None or low users. Chronic vs. Increasers Chronic vs. Moderate users
Work
commitment
Employment 0.37 ** (0.20, 0.68) 0.86 (0.39, 1.90) 0.39 * (0.17, 0.91)
Work achievement 0.62 (0.36, 1.06) 1.22 (0.55, 2.68) 0.73 (0.37, 1.45)
Incapacitated at work 27.94 *** (8.19, 95.33) 1.18 (0.50, 2.77) 3.62 * (1.23, 10.65)
Skipped work 0.70 (0.35, 1.39) 0.35 (0.22, 1.26) 0.50 (0.22, 1.14)

Financial stability Financial independence 0.35 *** (0.22, 0.56) 0.65 (0.34, 1.23) 0.35 *** (0.19, 0.64)
Financial problem 1.88 * (1.11, 3.17) 1.75 (0.82, 3.73) 1.15 (0.60, 2.23)

Social
environment
Co-worker’s illegal drug use 2.25 ** (1.27, 3.98) 0.71 (0.35, 1.46) 1.21 (0.59, 2.19)
Violence towards subject 3.01 *** (1.63, 5.55) 1.44 (0.64, 3.22) 1.99 (0.88, 4.48)
Peer drug association 6.94 *** (3.78, 12.73) 2.78 * (1.25, 6.18) 4.04 *** (1.78, 9.18)

Notes 1

*

p <0.05;

**

p<0.01;

***

p<0.001

2

Gender and ethnicity were statistically controlled.