Table 1.
Number of the micro-bars and the percentage of each failure mode of the μTBS tested specimens obtained from each tooth with cross-section size of 1×1 mm2, 1×2 mm2, and ×3 mm2.
Micro-bar cross- section |
Tooth | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plasma treated |
Control | Plasma treated |
Control | Plasma treated |
Control | Plasma treated |
Control | ||
1×1 mm2 | Number of micro-bars | 9 | 5 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 5 |
Interface & mixed failure* (%) | 33 | 60 | 63 | 44 | 29 | 44 | 100 | 100 | |
Cohesive failure* (%) | 67 | 40 | 27 | 56 | 71 | 56 | 0 | 0 | |
1×2 mm2 | Number of micro-bars | 9 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 11 | 9 |
Interface & mixed failure (%) | 33 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 71 | 100 | 82 | 89 | |
Cohesive failure (%) | 67 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 0 | 18 | 11 | |
1×3 mm2 | Number of micro-bars | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Interface & mixed failure (%) | 33 | 50 | 0 | 67 | 50 | 33 | 100 | 100 | |
Cohesive failure (%) | 67 | 50 | 100 | 33 | 50 | 67 | 0 | 0 |
Interface failure: fracture occurred in adhesive with no fractured dentin on the resin and no remnants of resin on the dentin surfaces; Cohesive failure: fracture is completely located in dentin, resin or Zapit; Mixed failure: test specimen shows both interface and cohesive failures.