Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2012 Oct;17(3):172–179. doi: 10.1177/2156587212450713

Table 2.

Bivariate Prevalence of Recent Use by National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Category and Specific Complementary and Alternative Medicine Modality, By Race and Ethnicity, Young Adults Aged 18 to 27 Years, National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, 2001–2002a

Complementary and Alternative
Medicine Therapy
Total
(%)
White
(%)
Black
(%)
Asian
(%)
Mexican
(%)
Cuban
(%)
Puerto
Rican (%)
Central/South
American (%)
Alternative medical systems 4.0 4.0 3.7 5.7 7.2 5.5 3.6 5.2
  Traditional healersc 1.7 1.5 2.8 1.2 2.3 0.3 0.8 1.6
  Homeopathicd 1.7 1.9 0.5 2.8 1.2 4.6 0.2 2.1
  Acupuncture 1.0 1.0 0.6 1.7 0.6 2.5 2.5 2.2
Biologically-based therapiesd 15.6 15.8 11.1 18.2 18.7 23.5 20.0 23.6
  Herbsd 11.4 12.3 6.5 15.4 11.2 7.9 15.5 13.7
  Vitamin therapyd 5.6 5.6 4.3 3.1 6.4 14.9 6.6 12.1
  Folk medicined 1.6 1.1 2.0 2.2 3.9 2.9 2.7 2.1
  Diets 1.1 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.7 2.8 1.8 0.7
Manipulative and body-based therapiesd 14.1 15.7 8.3 17.0 10.8 18.7 11.1 14.0
  Massaged 9.5 10.2 6.1 12.9 7.6 12.7 8.2 10.7
  Chiropracticd 7.0 8.1 3.6 5.5 5.3 11.8 5.4 4.9
Mind–body therapiesc 8.2 8.9 6.3 9.0 5.0 10.3 11.6 8.0
  Relaxationb 6.4 6.9 4.9 7.3 4.4 8.1 10.8 5.2
  Energy healing 1.0 1.3 0.3 1.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0
  Support group 1.3 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.1 3.0 1.1 1.4
  Guided imageryd 0.7 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.01 3.0 0.1 1.7
  Biofeedback 0.4 0.5 0.01 0.5 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.2
  Hypnosis 0.3 0.4 0.01 0.5 0.2 0.9 0.1 0.0
a

n = 14 128. Percentages are weighted to US population estimates. Design-based Ftest for bivariate analysis.

b

P ≤ .05.

c

P ≤ .01.

d

P ≤ .001