Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 10;13:339. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-339

Table 4.

Cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of MRI screening vs. annual mammography alone

Cost-effectiveness* Mammography only MRI &mammography Increment
 
Mean
95% CI
Mean
95% CI
Mean
95% CI
 Cost ($)
5,201
3,303-7,911
9,893
7,459-12,942
4,692
3,084-6,504
 QALYs
22.57
21.86-22.75
22.66
21.85-22.83
0.092
−0.027-0.190
 C/E ($/QALY)
231
146-351
437
329-572
50,911
Dominated-213,794
Screening effectiveness†
Mammography only
MRI &mammography
 
Mean (%)
95% CI
Mean (%)
95% CI
 
Incidence
42.7
38.8-46.7
42.7
38.7-46.7
 
Program sensitivity‡
71.7
65.9-77.2
93.9
89.4-97.3
 
Stage distribution
 In Situ
20.8
12.8-30.1
18.2
12.8-24.2
 
 Local
48.7
39.1-58.3
61
53.8-67.8
 
 Regional
26.9
19.6-35.5
19.1
13.9-25.1
 
 Distant
3.6
2-7.2
1.7
0.6-3.8
 
Survival 79.1 77.4-80.4 80.1 78.9-81.1  

Abbreviations: MRI magnetic resonance imaging, QALY quality-adjusted life year.

* Costs and utilities discounted at 3.5% per year.

† Calculated at end of MRI plus mammography screening program (age 65 years).

‡ Proportion of cancers in model detected by screening; all screen-detected cancers (true positives) divided by all incident cancers.