Skip to main content
. 2004 Mar;11(2):399–405. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.11.2.399-405.2004

TABLE 2.

Estimated median values of IL-10, IL-12, IgG, and IgA for cervical secretions extracted from different ophthalmic spongesa

Sponge(s) and biomarkerb Weck-Cel Ultracell Merocel Pc
First
    IL-10 (pg/ml) 29.2 87.2 164.1 0.09
    IL-12 (pg/ml) 278.9 397.5 298.3 0.7
    IgG (μg/ml) 2,221.2 2,592.6 2,549.6 0.5
    IgA (μg/ml) 325.3 591.6 590.2 0.09
Second
    IL-10 (pg/ml) 96.4 139.3 73.1 0.7
    IL-12 (pg/ml) 583.6 616.3 494.7 0.7
    IgG (μg/ml) 2,479.3 3,371.8 2,056.5 0.2
    IgA (μg/ml) 858.5 995.1 363.3 0.005
Combined
    IL-10 (pg/ml) 84.7 105.7 123.9 0.5
    IL-12 (pg/ml) 404.5 471.1 451.9 0.6
    IgG (μg/ml) 2,382.6 3,054.6 2,254.9 0.4
    IgA (μg/ml) 694.3 798.9 518.5 0.2
a

The value was estimated by correcting for the dilution resulting from the extraction from the ophthalmic sponge (see Materials and Methods).

b

“First” and “second” sponge refers to the sequence in which the specimen was collected in the paired collection. The numbers of first sponges are as follows: for Weck-Cel, n = 30; for Ultracell, n = 30; and for Merocel, n = 28. The numbers of second sponges are as follows: for Weck-Cel, n = 29; for Ultracell, n = 29; and for Merocel, n = 30. The number of combined sponges in each case is the sum of the numbers of first and second sponges: for Weck-Cel, n = 59; for Ultracell, n = 59; and for Merocel, n = 58.

c

Differences in recovery from the sponges were evaluated by the Kruskal-Wallis test, a nonparametric analysis of variance statistic, and statistical significance is highlighted in bold print.