Table 2. AIC value for each linear model describing the effect of body density deviation on stroke efforts. Underlines indicate the minimum AIC of each individual.
| Elephant seal | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 1 | 2 | 4 | Baikal seal |
| Null | −114 | −572 | −815 | −1230 |
| Squared horizontal speed | −128 | −579 | −895 | −1232 |
| Absolute density deviation | −112 | −585 | −880 | −1287 |
| Squared horizontal speed & Absolute density deviation | −130 | −606 | −906 | −1287 |
Note that the elephant seal 1 had a delta AIC of 2, compared between models including and not including absolute density deviation. It suggests less evidence to select the more complex model, which might be caused by relatively small sampling number (n = 12 + 19) in comparison with other seals (Table 1).