Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 16.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;195(1):7–14. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.051672

Table 3. Analysis of effect modification by study characteristics: Prenatal risk factors with heterogeneity (p<0.10).

Prenatal Risk Factors Significant Sources of Between-Study
Heterogeneity: Study Characteristics (p<0.10) a
Summary Effect
Estimate
(95% CI)
Infections during pregnancy 1.18 (0.76-1.83)
Multivariate vs. univariate analysis (p=0.09)
 4 studies: controlled for multiple covariates 1.82 (1.01-3.30)
 7 studies: no control for covariates 0.89 (0.56-1.42)
Nausea/Vomiting 1.16 (0.65-2.09)
Exposure data collection (p=0.004)
 3 studies: prospective 1.48 (1.03-2.14)
 3 studies: retrospective 0.55 (0.31-0.98)
Maternal age: linear trend none 1.07 (1.01-1.13)
Birth order: linear trend none 0.95 (0.89-1.02)
Smoking during pregnancy 1.00 (0.75-1.36)
Population-based (p=0.06)
 3 studies: population-based 1.15 (0.90-1.47)
 2 studies: clinic-based 0.63 (0.37-1.08)
Mother born in another country none 1.28 (0.99-1.65)
Bleeding none 1.81 (1.14-2.86)
Toxemia/Preeclampsia,
hypertension, swelling
none 1.01 (0.80-1.27)
a

exposure data collection= effect modification by exposure measurement (prospective vs. retrospective) diagnostic criteria = effect modification by diagnostic criteria (narrow vs. broad) multivariate vs. univariate analysis = effect modification by the degree of control for covariates population-based = effect modification by population-based vs. clinic-based sample abnormal = effect modification by use of normal comparison group vs. abnormal comparison group none= no effect modification (p<0.10) by any of the above study characteristics