Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 14;28(8):2032–2044. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det098

Table I.

The need for and the characteristics of a new classification system: structured questionnaire for the first round of the DELPHI procedure.

I. Is there a need for a new classification system?
Strongly agree Agree Indifferent Disagree Strongly disagree
42/89 (47.2%) 35/89 (39.3%) 8/89 (9%) 4/89 (4.5%) 0%
Agreement: 86.5% 9% Disagreement: 4.5%
Rate of agreement: 82%
II. Select the three most important characteristics that should be taken into account in the development of a new system
Characteristic Ranking Selected as one of the three
Clear and accurate 1 72.1%
 Comprehensive 36.8%
 Correlated with patient's clinical presentation 39.7%
Correlated with patient's management 2 66.2%
Simple and friendly 3 64.7%
 Smooth movement from the old to the new one 20.6%
III. Which of the following statements should be taken into account in the development of a new system
1. Anatomy should be the basic characteristic for patients’ grouping
Strongly agree Agree Indifferent Disagree Strongly disagree
51/89 (57.3%) 33/89 (37.1%) 5/89 (5.6%) 0% 0%
Agreement: 94.4% 5.6% Disagreement: 0%
Rate of agreement: 94.4%
2. There is a ‘key’ organ of the female genital tract that should be used in priority for the development of a new system
Strongly agree Agree Indifferent Disagree Strongly disagree
25/89 (28.1%) 30/89 (33.7%) 24/89 (27.0%) 9/89 (10.1%) 1/89 (1.1%)
Agreement: 61.8% 27.0% Disagreement: 11.2%
In case of agreement, indicate: uterus
Rate of agreement: 50.6%
3. Embryological origin should be the basic characteristic for patients’ grouping
Strongly agree Agree Indifferent Disagree Strongly disagree
12/89 (13.5%) 13/89 (14.6%) 42/89 (47.2%) 20/89 (22.5%) 2/89 (2.2%)
Agreement: 28.1% 47.2% Disagreement: 24.7%
Rate of agreement: 3.4%
4. Embryological origin should be used, if feasible, as a secondary characteristic for patients’ grouping
Strongly agree Agree Indifferent Disagree Strongly disagree
13/89 (14.6%) 50/89 (56.2%) 18/89 (20.2%) 7/89 (7.9%) 1/89 (1.1%)
Agreement: 70.8% 20.2% Disagreement: 9.0%
Rate of agreement: 61.8%
IV. Comments (feel free to make additional comments)

The scale of answers includes five degrees to rank the agreement in each scientific issue; the extent of agreement between the participants is shown in percentages.