Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 25.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2013 Jun 13;52(25):4331–4342. doi: 10.1021/bi400182y

Table 1.

Predicted and observed distribution of intermediates in RFQ experiments

t = 0 s t = 320 ms t = 3 s

Prediction (At start) Observation (Mössbauer) Prediction (Kinetics) Observation (Mössbauer) Prediction (Kinetics) Observation (Mössbauer)
100 % Hred 95 % diferrous 55 % Hslred 86 % diferrous 50 % Hslred 58 % diferrous
33 % P* 10 % P*

3.4 % P 3 % P 4 % P 7 % P
3.6 % (Q + Hox) 5 % Hox 22 % Q 23 % Q
2 % Hox 7 % Hox+ Hslox
6 % Hslox

5 % unidentifieda 5 % unidentitiedb 5 % unidentifieda 5 % unidentifiedb 5 % unidentifieda
a

In all samples, approximately 5 % of the Mössbauer absorption could not be positively identified as it competes with the noise. This absorption is probably associated with diferric species (not a single one). It is certainly not originating from ferrous MMOH and may derive in part from unreduced enzyme.

b

Assumed from the Mössbauer spectrum of the t = 0 sample.