Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2009 Oct;8(10):4860–4869. doi: 10.1021/pr900318k

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A) Comparison of transmembrane proteins detected with both techniques shows the same percentage of overlap as the comparison of all protein identifications depicted in Fig. 2B B) The average number of peptide detections per sample for both platforms is comparable C) Visualization of peptide distribution into steps/fractions shows a trimodal repartition after OFFGEL separation whereas the majority of peptides are detected in the first steps of MudPIT analyses