Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 19;38(6):1288–1296. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs068

Table 2.

Classification Accuracy of PQ-16 (ie, Sensitivity, Specificity, Predictive Values, Likelihood Ratio, Area Under the Curve, and Confidence Intervals) vs CAARMS Diagnosis of UHR/Psychosis vs No CAARMS Diagnosis

PQ-16 Cutoff, Total Score Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) LR+ (%) AUC 95% CI P
≥0 100 0 11 1.00 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥1 100 16 12 100 1.19 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥2 100 34 15 100 1.51 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥3 100 52 19 100 2.06 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥4 97 67 26 99 2.93 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥5 91 79 34 99 4.30 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥6a 87 87 44 98 6.75 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥7 76 92 53 97 9.61 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥8 58 95 59 95 12.48 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥9 43 97 63 94 14.37 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥10 31 99 72 92 21.47 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥11 22 99 75 92 25.34 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥12 16 100 81 91 35.42 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥13 10 100 86 90 51.29 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥14 5 100 86 90 54.14 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥15 3 100 92 90 94.04 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001
≥16 1 100 100 90 0.93 0.92–0.94 .0001

Note: PQ, Prodromal Questionnaire.

a

Highest average of sensitivity and specificity.