Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013 Apr 24;45(3):306–312. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.03.003

Table 3.

Predictors of Preparedness to Implement CM

Predictor B Odds Ratio (95% CI) Chi Square p value
Years experience in addiction field (referent = 1 year or less)
    2-5 years -1.12 0.33 (0.03-3.08) 0.96 .33
    6-10 years -0.63 0.54 (0.06-5.25) 0.29 .59
    11-20 years -1.18 0.31 (0.03-2.97) 1.04 .31
    More than 20 years -1.08 0.34 (0.03-3.45) 0.84 .36
Recovery status (referent = not in recovery)
    In recovery -0.18 0.84 (0.30-2.32) 0.12 .73
    Prefer not to answer 0.14 1.15 (0.27-5.02) 0.04 .85
Cognitive, behavioral or cognitive-behavioral therapy as primary therapeutic approach (compared to any other approach) 0.29 1.33 (0.65-2.73) 0.61 .44
Extent of prior CM training (referent = none)
    Less than 1 hour -0.01 0.99 (0.29-3.42) 0.00 .99
    1-2 hours -0.26 0.77 (0.29-2.10) 0.26 .61
    3-5 hours 0.90 2.47 (0.83-7.34) 2.64 .10
    6-10 hours -0.23 0.80 (0.16-3.88) .08 .78
    More than 10 hours -1.03 0.36 (0.08-1.55) 1.89 .17
Prior CM experience (any versus none) 0.35 1.42 (0.65-3.11) 0.78 .38
Post-training CMBQ subscale scores
    General barriers 0.78 2.19 (0.99-4.84) 3.71 .05
    Training-related barriers -1.28 0.28 (0.15-0.53) 15.11 < 001
    Pro-CM 1.56 4.74 (2.43-9.24) 20.80 < 001
Post-training knowledge scores 0.12 1.13 (0.99-1.29) 3.04 .08

Note. CI = confidence interval, CM = contingency management, CMBQ = Contingency Management Beliefs Questionnaire.