Table 6.
Comparison of the measured binding parameters of the representative BAFs with orange G by NMR titrations
Compound | Predicted binding energy (kcal/mol) | fmax | Kd (µM) |
---|---|---|---|
BAF1 | −8 | 0.47 ± 0.04 | 12 ± 7 |
BAF8 | −12 | 0.82 ± 0.04 | 24 ± 5 |
Orange-G | −8 | 0.46 ± 0.06 | 43 ± 21 |
The second column lists the predicted binding energy for each top docked model of BAF compounds with KLVFFA fiber, and the binding energy of Orange-G with KLVFFA fiber were also calculated for comparison. Our computational method identified the BAF with better fit to the binding interface than Orange-G. We then used NMR titration to determine the binding affinity. Our previous mass spectrometric analyses of the crystal of the Orange-G with KLVFFA fibers have suggested a binding ratio of compound:fiber with the range of 1:1 to 1:10 (Landau et al., 2011). Together with our structural models and single binding site assumption, we estimated the binding ratio to be 1:3. Accordingly, calculated NMR binding parameters are listed in the table. The third column fmax is the maximum fraction of NMR signal decrease of compound upon binding saturation (‘Materials and methods’).