Table 3.

Students’ evaluation (%) after the first run of the revised curriculum

Process	Strongly Agree	agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The course introduction gave students was informative	21.4	57.1	14.3	6.3	0.9
Sufficient information was transferred to the students.	15.0	59.3	18.6	6.2	0.9
Course contents were practical for interns	23.1	50.9	13.9	11.1	0.9
Interactive educational methods were used appropriately	15.2	48.2	18.8	17.0	0
Course contents were scheduled appropriately	14.3	44.6	18.8	21.4	0.9
Students evaluation methods were acceptable	6.7	30.5	43.8	15.2	3.8
Management performance in terms of access to resources and information was acceptable	8.9	36.6	33.9	18.8	1.8
Amount and contents of assignments were appropriate	18.6	50.4	18.6	10.6	1.8

outcome	Strongly Agree	agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
The course enabled students to realize and accept their professional obligations	12.4	59.3	15.0	13.3	0
The course enabled students to understand the human and moral aspects of their profession	11.5	54.9	20.4	12.4	0.9
The course increased students attention to ethical issues around them	34.5	53.1	9.7	2.7	0
The course provided adequate primary skills and knowledge for appropriate ethical decision making while considering legal matters	8.8	46.0	26.5	16.8	1.8
The course enabled students to use the acquired knowledge and skills in ethical decision making	7.1	44.2	27.4	16.8	4.4

Teaching methods	Strongly Agree	agree	Neutral	Disagree	Strongly Disagree
Small discussion groups	30.3	50.5	14.7	2.8	1.8
Lectures	6.4	40.4	42.2	9.2	1.8
Case presentation on final ethics rounds	31.7	47.1	17.3	3.8	0
Use of interactive methods	22.9	45.0	24.8	6.4	0.9
portfolio	12.1	39.3	32.7	12.1	3.7