Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 5;15(6):e109. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2458

Table 1.

Characteristics of the participants in the validation study (n=167a).

Characteristics By group By gender All
(n=167)

Group 1
(n=82)
Group 2
(n=46)
Group 3
(n=39)
Men
(n=35)
Women
(n=132)

Gender, n (%)






Male 16 (19.5) 11 (23.9) 8 (20.5)

35 (21.0)

Female 66 (80.5) 35 (76.1) 31 (79.5)

132 (79.0)
Age (years), mean (SD) 34 (12) 31 (11) 33 (12) 33 (10) 33 (12) 33 (12)
BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) 23 (3.6) 23 (3.4) 23 (3.7) 24 (2.2) 23 (3.8) 23 (3.6)
Education >12 years, n (%) 64 (78.0) 38 (82.6) 32 (82.1) 28 (80.0) 106 (80.3) 134 (80.2)
Working full time, n (%) 33 (40.2) 12 (26.1) 10 (25.6) 12 (34.3) 43 (32.6) 55 (32.9)
Student, n (%) 41 (50.0) 31 (67.4) 26 (66.7) 19 (54.3) 79 (59.8) 98 (58.7)
Background in nutritionb, n (%) 21 (25.6) 15 (32.6) 13 (33.3) 6 (17.1) 43 (32.6) 49 (29.3)
Tobacco usec, n (%) 11 (13.4) 5 (10.9) 6 (15.4) 12 (34.3) 10 (7.6) 22 (13.2)

aFrom this study sample, 4 underreporters were excluded for analysis with the WFR (n=163). There were no statistically significant differences in characteristics between groups or sexes, except for Swedish snuff between sexes (1.8% women and 4.2% men, P=.001) via 2-sample t test and Fisher’s exact test.

bStudying or working in the nutrition field.

cTobacco use = smoking and/or Swedish snuff. Values are missing for 3 women in group 3.